首页> 外文期刊>Journal of accounting and public policy >Evidence-based policymaking in auditing regulation: An historical analysis of academic research citation in PCAOB standard-setting practices
【24h】

Evidence-based policymaking in auditing regulation: An historical analysis of academic research citation in PCAOB standard-setting practices

机译:审计规范中的基于证据的决策:PCAOB标准制定实践中学术研究引用的历史分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The success of the auditing profession hinges on the efficient and effective development of authoritative guidance that directs practice. Given the opportunity to assist, academicians can provide an understanding of the costs, benefits, and unintended consequences of potential regulatory decisions. Currently, few studies exist in the extant literature that explore the relationship between the development of auditing standards and the contribution of academic research. To investigate the scope of academic literature consideration in the development of public company auditing regulation, we examine whether and to what extent academic citations are referenced throughout the PCAOB's rulemaking documents. We find evidence that the PCAOB currently appears to incorporate the use of an evidence-based policymaking approach in its standard-setting practices, progressively evolving since its incipience. The findings of this study may lead to a calling for more robust academic discussion in future PCAOB public policy decisions, which in turn may benefit the auditing profession. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:审计专业的成功涉及指导实践的有效指导的高效有效发展。鉴于协助的机会,院士可以了解潜在监管决定的成本,福利和意外后果的理解。目前,现存文学中存在一些研究,探讨了审计标准的发展与学术研究的贡献之间的关系。为了调查公共公司审计监管发展中的学术文献考虑范围,我们审查了在整个PCAOB的规划文件中引用了学术引用的程度。我们发现证据表明,PCAOB目前似乎在其标准制定实践中纳入了基于证据的决策方法,自其兴奋剂以来逐步发展。本研究的调查结果可能导致在未来的PCAOB公共政策决策中呼吁更加强大的学术讨论,这反过来可能会使审计专业受益。 (c)2019 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号