...
首页> 外文期刊>Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety >Rethinking Critical Care: Decreasing Sedation, Increasing Delirium Monitoring, and Increasing Patient Mobility
【24h】

Rethinking Critical Care: Decreasing Sedation, Increasing Delirium Monitoring, and Increasing Patient Mobility

机译:重新考虑重症监护:减少镇静作用,增加Deli妄监测并增加患者活动能力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: Sedation management, delirium monitoring, and mobility programs have been addressed in evidence-based critical care guidelines and care bundles, yet implementation in the ICU remains variable. As critically ill patients occupy higher percentages of hospital beds in the United States and beyond, it is increasingly important to determine mechanisms to deliver better care. The Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Rethinking Critical Care (IHI-RCC) program was established to reduce harm of critically ill patients by decreasing sedation, increasing monitoring and management of delirium, and increasing patient mobility. Case studies of a convenience sample of five participating hospitals/health systems chosen in advance of the determination of their clinical outcomes are presented in terms of how they got started and process improvements in sedation management, delirium management, and mobility. Methods: The IHI-RCC program involved one live case study and five iterations of an in-person seminar in a 33-month period (March 2011-November 2013) that emphasized interdisciplinary teamwork and culture change. Results: Qualitative descriptions of the changes tested at each of the five case study sites demonstrate improvements in teamwork, processes, and reliability of daily work. Improvement in ICU length of stay and length of stay on the ventilator between the pre- and postimplementation periods varied from slight to substantial. Conclusion: Changing critical care practices requires an interdisciplinary approach addressing cultural, psychological, and practical issues. The key lessons of the IHI-RCC program are as follows: the importance of testing changes on a small scale, feeding back data regularly and providing sufficient education, and building will through seeing the work in action.
机译:背景:镇静管理,del妄监测和行动计划已在基于证据的重症监护指南和护理包中得到解决,但在ICU中的实施仍然存在差异。在美国及其他地区,由于重症患者占据更高的病床比例,因此确定提供更好护理的机制变得越来越重要。建立医疗保健改善研究所的重症重症监护(IHI-RCC)计划旨在通过减少镇静,增加,妄的监测和管理以及增加患者的活动性来减轻重症患者的伤害。在确定临床结局之前选择了五个参与医院/卫生系统的便利样本的案例研究,以镇静方法,镇静管理,mobility妄管理和活动性的启动方式和过程改进方面进行了介绍。方法:IHI-RCC计划涉及一个现场案例研究和一个为期33个月(2011年3月至2013年11月)的面对面研讨会的五次迭代,强调跨学科团队合作和文化变革。结果:对五个案例研究站点中的每个站点测试的变更的定性描述表明,团队协作,流程和日常工作的可靠性得到了改善。在实施前和实施后之间,ICU住院天数和呼吸机住院天数的改善范围从轻微到明显。结论:改变重症监护实践需要一种跨学科的方法来解决文化,心理和实践问题。 IHI-RCC计划的主要教训如下:进行小规模测试变更,定期反馈数据并提供充分教育的重要性,以及通过观察实际工作来建立意愿。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    Adult Critical Care Cardiovascular Clinical Nurse Specialist, St. Luke's Hospital Boise/Meridian, Idaho;

    Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Cambridge, Massachusetts;

    Clinical Research, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Orlando Health, Florida;

    Clinical Lead for Critical Care, Samaritan Hospital, Troy, New York;

    Respiratory Care, Rapid City Regional Hospital, South Dakota;

    Adult ICU, Rapid City Regional Hospital, South Dakota;

    Mission Hospital, Asheville, North Carolina;

    Samaritan Hospital, Troy, New York;

    Inpatient Medical Group, P. Phillips Hospital, Orlando Health, Florida;

    Department of Medicine, Division of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, Center for Health Services Research, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Tennessee Valley Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC);

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号