...
首页> 外文期刊>Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety >Perspectives on Implementing Quality Improvement Collaboratives Effectively: Qualitative Findings from the CHIPRA Quality Demonstration Grant Program
【24h】

Perspectives on Implementing Quality Improvement Collaboratives Effectively: Qualitative Findings from the CHIPRA Quality Demonstration Grant Program

机译:有效实施质量改进合作组织的观点:CHIPRA质量示范资助计划的定性发现

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: The most frequently pursued intervention in the $100 million, 18-state Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009 (CHIPRA) quality demonstration (2010-2015) was quality improvement collaboratives, which 12 states offered to more than 300 primary care practices. A study was conducted to identify which aspects of these collaboratives were viewed by organizers and participants as working well and which were not. Methods: Some 223 interviews were conducted in these states near the end of their collaboratives. Interview notes were coded and analyzed to identify trends. Results: Aspects of collaboratives that interviewees valued were aimed at attracting participation, maintaining engagement, or facilitating learning. To attract participants, interviewees recommended offering maintenance-of-certification credits, aligning content with existing financial incentives, hiring a knowledgeable collaborative organizer of the same medical specialty as participants, and having national experts speak at meetings. Positively viewed approaches for maintaining engagement included meeting one-on-one with practices to articulate participation expectations in advance, tying disbursal of stipends to meeting participation expectations, and soliciting feedback and making mid-course adjustments. To facilitate learning, interviewees liked learning from other practices, interactive exercises, practical handouts, and meeting face-to-face with new referral partners. Conclusion: Prior studies have tended to focus on strategies to maintain engagement. The interviewees valued these features but also valued aspects of collaboratives that attracted participants in the first place and facilitated learning after participants were actively engaged. The findings suggest that a wider array of features may be important when developing or evaluating collaboratives. Collaborative organizers may benefit from incorporating the recommended collaborative features into their own collaboratives.
机译:背景:在价值1亿美元的18个州的2009年儿童健康保险计划重新授权法案(CHIPRA)质量示范(2010-2015年)中,最经常采用的干预措施是质量改进合作,其中12个州提供了300多种初级护理实践。进行了一项研究,以确定组织者和参与者认为这些合作的哪些方面运作良好,而哪些方面运作不佳。方法:协作结束时,在这些州进行了约223次访谈。对访谈记录进行编码和分析,以识别趋势。结果:受访者重视的协作方面是为了吸引参与,保持敬业度或促进学习。为了吸引参与者,受访者建议提供认证维持学分,使内容与现有的经济激励措施保持一致,雇用与参与者相同医学专业的知识渊博的合作组织者,以及让国家专家在会议上发言。积极参与的保持参与的方法包括与一对一会议,提前表达参与期望的做法,将津贴支出与参与期望相联系,征求反馈意见并进行中途调整。为了促进学习,受访者喜欢从其他实践,互动练习,实用讲义中学习,并与新的推荐对象进行面对面的交流。结论:先前的研究倾向于集中于保持参与的策略。受访者重视这些功能,但也重视协作的方面,这些方面首先吸引了参与者,并在参与者积极参与之后促进了学习。研究结果表明,在开发或评估协作时,更广泛的功能可能很重要。协作组织者可能会受益于将推荐的协作功能合并到自己的协作中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号