【24h】

Learning from Fukushima

机译:向福岛学习

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Disasters prompt us to seek lessons. After the tragic trifecta of earthquake, tsunami, and nuclear failure at the Fukushima Daiichi reactors in March 2011, many people have turned to Japan to understand what went wrong and how to prevent such an event from recurring. As we approach the first anniversary of the earthquake, there still seems to be little agreement on what these lessons should be. Some point to the relatively minor release of radioactive material and the outdated design of the reactors to argue that nuclear power is safe, whereas others take Fukushima as blatant evidence that nuclear power remains unsafe. Germany responded to Fukushima by accelerating its nuclear exit, but France reaffirmed its strong commitment to nuclear energy. Moreover, as with previous nuclear accidents at Three Mile Island and Chernobyl, lessons tend to fall within one of two categories: those that blame technology, such as the reactor design, and those that blame social factors, such as poorly conceived regulations or corporate greed.
机译:灾难促使我们寻求教训。在2011年3月福岛第一核电站反应堆发生地震,海啸和核故障的悲剧三重奏之后,许多人转向日本,以了解出了什么问题以及如何防止此类事件再次发生。在临近地震一周年之际,对于这些教训的看法似乎仍未达成共识。有些人指出放射性物质的释放相对较少,而反应堆的设计过时,则认为核电是安全的,而另一些人则以福岛为公然证据表明核电仍然不安全。德国对福岛的反应是加快核出口,但法国重申了对核能的坚定承诺。此外,就像先前在三哩岛和切尔诺贝利发生的核事故一样,教训往往属于以下两类之一:归咎于技术,如反应堆设计;归咎于社会因素,如构思不佳的法规或公司贪婪。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Issues in Science and Technology》 |2012年第3期|p.79-84|共6页
  • 作者单位

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Technology & Policy Program;

    University of California-Berkeley;

    Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research at MIT;

    Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:51:12

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号