首页> 外文期刊>ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing >Estimation and analysis of gross primary production of soybean under various management practices and drought conditions
【24h】

Estimation and analysis of gross primary production of soybean under various management practices and drought conditions

机译:在各种管理方式和干旱条件下大豆初级生产总值的估算和分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Gross primary production (GPP) of croplands may be used to quantify crop productivity and evaluate a range of management practices. Eddy flux data from three soybean (Glycine max L.) fields under different management practices (no-till vs. till; rainfed vs. irrigated) and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrora-diometer (MODIS) derived vegetation indices (VIs) were used to test the capabilities of remotely sensed VIs and soybean phenology to estimate the seasonal dynamics of carbon fluxes. The modeled GPP (GPP_(VPM)) using vegetation photosynthesis model (VPM) was compared with the GPP (GPP_(EC)) estimated from eddy covariance measurements. The VIs tracked soybean phenology well and delineated the growing season length (GSL), which was closely related to carbon uptake period (CUP, R~2 = 0.84), seasonal sums of net ecosystem CO_2 exchange (NEE, R~2 = 0.78), and GPP_(EC) (R~2 = 0.54). Land surface water index (LSWI) tracked drought-impacted vegetation well, as the LSWI values were positive during non-drought periods and negative during severe droughts within the soybean growing season. On a seasonal scale, NEE of the soybean sites ranged from -37 to -264 g C m~(-2). The result suggests that rainfed soybean fields needed about 450-500 mm of well-distributed seasonal rainfall to maximize the net carbon sink. During non-drought conditions, VPM accurately estimated seasonal dynamics and interannual variation of GPP of soybean under different management practices. However, some large discrepancies between GPP_(VPM) and GPP_(EC) were observed under drought conditions as the VI did not reflect the corresponding decrease in GPP_(EC). Diurnal GPP_(EC) dynamics showed a bimodal distribution with a pronounced midday depression at the period of higher water vapor pressure deficit (>1.2 kPa). A modified W_(scalar) based on LSWI to account for the water stress in VPM helped quantify the reduction in GPP during severe drought and the model's performance improved substantially. In conclusion, this study demonstrates the potential of integrating vegetation activity through satellite remote sensing with ground-based flux and climate data for a better understanding and upscaling of carbon fluxes of soybean croplands.
机译:农田的初级生产总值(GPP)可用于量化作物生产力和评估一系列管理实践。使用不同管理方式(免耕与耕作;雨育与灌溉)的三个大豆田的涡流数据和中等分辨率成像光谱仪(MODIS)得出的植被指数(VIs)进行测试遥感VI和大豆物候学评估碳通量的季节性动态的能力。将使用植被光合作用模型(VPM)的建模GPP(GPP_(VPM))与根据涡度协方差测量估算的GPP(GPP_(EC))进行了比较。 VIs很好地跟踪了大豆物候,并描绘了生长季节长度(GSL),该长度与碳吸收时期(CUP,R〜2 = 0.84),生态系统净CO_2交换的季节性总和(NEE,R〜2 = 0.78)密切相关。 ,以及GPP_(EC)(R〜2 = 0.54)。土地表面水指数(LSWI)很好地跟踪了受干旱影响的植被,因为LSWI值在非干旱时期为正,而在大豆生长季节严重干旱时为负。在季节尺度上,大豆位点的NEE范围为-37至-264 g C m〜(-2)。结果表明,雨养大豆田需要约450-500毫米的均匀分布的季节性降雨,以使净碳汇最大化。在非干旱条件下,VPM可以准确估算在不同管理方式下大豆的GPP的季节动态和年际变化。但是,在干旱条件下观察到GPP_(VPM)和GPP_(EC)之间的一些较大差异,因为VI不能反映GPP_(EC)的相应下降。昼间GPP_(EC)动力学表现出双峰分布,在较高的水蒸气压亏空(> 1.2 kPa)期间,午间明显下降。基于LSWI的改进W_(标量)以解决VPM中的水分胁迫,有助于量化严重干旱期间GPP的减少,并且模型的性能得到了显着改善。总之,这项研究证明了通过卫星遥感将植被活动与地面通量和气候数据相结合的潜力,可以更好地了解和提高大豆农田的碳通量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号