...
首页> 外文期刊>International Urogynecology Journal >Is Doppler planimetry a valid technique for the evaluation of postpartum urinary bladder volume?
【24h】

Is Doppler planimetry a valid technique for the evaluation of postpartum urinary bladder volume?

机译:多普勒平面仪是评估产后膀胱容量的有效技术吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The objective of this prospective study was to evaluate the accuracy of conventional 2D ultrasound (CUS) versus doppler planimetry (DP) in the assessment of postpartum urinary bladder volume compared to a true estimate using urethral catheterisation. Fifty-two women were assessed within 24 hours of delivery. Evaluation of bladder volume was performed using CUS (1-estimate) and DP (6-estimates). CUS had a higher correlation (r=0.796) with the true volume and lower % error than DP in the postpartum group. DP readings were highly reproducible (ICC 0.81) but tended to overestimate the true value especially with smaller volumes. DP was suboptimal for the assessment of the postpartum PVR. Postpartum evaluation using CUS is more accurate in calculating the true urinary volume.
机译:这项前瞻性研究的目的是评估与使用尿道导管置入术的真实估计相比,常规2D超声(CUS)与多普勒仪(DP)评估产后膀胱体积的准确性。分娩后24小时内评估了52名妇女。膀胱容量的评估是使用CUS(1个估算值)和DP(6个估算值)进行的。与产后组中的DP相比,CUS与真实体积的相关性更高(r = 0.796),且%错误率更低。 DP读数具有很高的可重复性(ICC 0.81),但往往会高估真实值,尤其是在较小体积的情况下。 DP对产后PVR的评估不理想。使用CUS进行产后评估可更准确地计算出实际尿量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号