首页> 外文期刊>International tax and public finance >Empirical evidence on the effects of tax incentives
【24h】

Empirical evidence on the effects of tax incentives

机译:关于税收优惠政策效果的经验证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper considers two empirical questions about tax incentives: (ⅰ) are incentives used as tools of tax competition and (ⅱ) how effective are incentives in attracting investment? To answer these, we prepared a new dataset of tax incentives in over 40 Latin American, Caribbean and African countries for the period 1985-2004. Using spatial econometrics techniques for panel data to answer the first question, we find evidence for strategic interaction in tax holidays, in addition to the well-known competition over the corporate income tax (CIT) rate. We find no robust evidence, however, for competition over investment allowances and tax credits. Using dynamic panel data econometrics to answer the second question, we find evidence that lower CIT rates and longer tax holidays are effective in attracting FDI in Latin America and the Caribbean but not in Africa. None of the tax incentives is effective in boosting gross private fixed capital formation.
机译:本文考虑了有关税收激励的两个经验性问题:(ⅰ)激励是否被用作税收竞争的工具;(ⅱ)激励在吸引投资方面的效果如何?为了回答这些问题,我们准备了一个新的1985-2004年期间40多个拉丁美洲,加勒比和非洲国家的税收优惠政策数据集。使用空间计量经济学技术处理面板数据来回答第一个问题,除了众所周知的企业所得税(CIT)率竞争之外,我们还发现了免税期战略互动的证据。但是,我们没有强有力的证据证明在投资补贴和税收抵免方面存在竞争。使用动态面板数据计量经济学回答第二个问题,我们发现有证据表明,较低的企业所得税税率和较长的免税期可以有效地吸引拉丁美洲和加勒比地区的外国直接投资,但对非洲没有吸引力。任何税收优惠措施都不能有效地促进私人固定资本形成总额。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号