...
首页> 外文期刊>International review of economics >Does globalization exacerbate income inequality in two largest emerging economies? The role of FDI and remittances inflows
【24h】

Does globalization exacerbate income inequality in two largest emerging economies? The role of FDI and remittances inflows

机译:全球化是否在两个最大的新兴经济体中加剧了收入不平等? FDI和汇款流入的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Using the annual data from 1980 to 2013, this study explores the effects of economic globalization on income inequality for a sample of two emerging economics, China and India, by endogenizing FDI inflows, remittances inflows, sectoral output, infra-structural development, human capital formation, government size, urbanization and economic growth as relevant determinants into the income inequality model. By applying combined cointegration method of Bayer-Hanck (J Time Ser Anal 34(1): 83-95, 2013) and ARDL bounds testing of cointegration approach of Pesaran et al. (J Appl Econom 16(3):289-326, 2001); it finds that there is the existence of a long-run relationship among the variables in our inequality model for both India and China. After confirming cointegration among the variables, the long-run results based on ARDL model surprisingly revealed that economic globalization widens the income inequality in India but the same factor reduces the income inequality in China. Contrastingly, both the FDI and remittances inflows significantly contribute to reduce income inequality in China, while the same worsens the income inequality in India. In examining the role and effects of structural changes in both the economies from the changing sectoral contributions of output in total output (industry sector and service sectors) in our model, it exposes the fact that the changing sectoral growth contribution has been leading to rising income inequality in China while the same has been resulting in reduction of income inequality in India. The infrastructural development has led to rising income inequality in both the countries, while human capital formation as expected reduces income inequality for both the countries. It also observes that economic growth, urbanization and government size enable both the economies to improve in their pattern of income distribution which have significant implication for public policy of both the economies while aiming at reducing poverty and inequality.
机译:本研究利用年度数据从1980年到2013年,通过内生FDI流入,汇款流入,部门产出,缺课结构发展,人力资本,探讨了经济全球化对两种新兴经济学的样本的收入不平等的影响。形成,政府规模,城市化和经济增长,与相关决定因素进入收入不平等模式。通过应用Bayer-Hanck的组合协整方法(J Time Ser Anal 34(1):83-95,2013)和Pesaran等人的协整方法的ARDL界限测试。 (J Appl Color 16(3):289-326,2001);它发现,在印度和中国的不等式模式中存在变量之间存在长期关系。在确认变量之间的协整结合后,基于ARDL模型的长期结果令人惊讶地显示,经济全球化扩大了印度的收入不平等,但同样的因素降低了中国的收入不平等。比较方面,FDI和汇款流入大大有助于降低中国收入不平等,而印度的收入不平等相同。在审查我们模型中不断变化的部门捐款中的结构变化的作用和影响,它在我们的模型中,它暴露了不断变化的部门增长贡献导致收入上升的事实中国不平等虽然同样导致了印度收入不平等的影响。基础设施发展导致了各国收入不平等上升,而人力资本形成预期会降低两国的收入不平等。它还观察到,经济增长,城市化和政府规模使经济能够改善其收入分配格局,这对经济的公共政策产生重大影响,同时旨在减少贫困和不平等。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号