首页> 外文期刊>International Politics >Containment's deceit: why the United States needs to review its China strategy
【24h】

Containment's deceit: why the United States needs to review its China strategy

机译:遏制的欺骗:为什么美国需要检讨其对华战略

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Together with many other scholars of US containment, Brooks/Wohlforth share widely held assumptions on the future US-China relationship. Indeed, their arguments tempt American strategists into foregoing evaluations as the enduring US structural superiority, reflected in the strategy of "standing on the defensive", reassures them that Beijing will be socialised to structural realities favouring the USA. However, China is not the Soviet Union and the twenty-first century's second decade not the 1980s. Confusing the latter with today's China and its highly adaptive governance system misrepresents a drastically changed politico-material context, as China has emerged as the leading economic power since 2014 (measured in PPP). Precisely because Brooks/Wohlforth adopt an exclusively material view, they overlook the notion of US cultural superiority which has invariably underpinned material accounts of containment. Thus, their material defence of America as "Number One" becomes a cognitive barrier, possibly self-defeating, to more comprehensive reviews of US technological superiority.
机译:Brooks / Wohlforth与许多其他对美国进行遏制的学者一起,对未来的美中关系持有广泛的假设。的确,他们的论点诱使美国战略家们做出上述评估,认为美国的持久结构优势体现在“站在防御上”战略中,从而使他们确信北京将社会化以有利于美国的结构现实。但是,中国不是苏联,二十世纪第二个十年不是1980年代。后者与当今的中国及其高度适应的治理体系相混淆,代表了急剧变化的政治物质环境,因为中国自2014年以来已成为领先的经济大国(按购买力平价衡量)。正是由于布鲁克斯/沃尔福斯(Brooks / Wohlforth)采取了唯一的物质观点,他们忽略了美国文化优势的概念,而美国文化优势始终支撑着物质遏制。因此,他们对美国作为“第一”的物质辩护成为对美国技术优势进行更全面评估的认知障碍,可能会自我击败。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号