首页> 外文期刊>International Planning Studies >Restricted Mobilities: Access to, and Activities in, Public and Private Spaces
【24h】

Restricted Mobilities: Access to, and Activities in, Public and Private Spaces

机译:限制出行:进入公共空间和私人空间并在其中活动

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Privatization of public spaces in the contemporary city has increased over the past few decades, but only a few studies have approached this trend from a mobility perspective. Therefore, this article seeks to make a contribution to the field by exploring two Australian examples of private spaces in the city, gated communities and shopping centres, through the 'mobility' lenses. The article illustrates how different mobility systems enable and/or restrict public access to private-public spaces, and it points out that proprietary communities create an unequal potential for human movement and access in the city. The main argument in the article is that many mobility systems enable specialization of places that are targeted at a special section of the population. This means that various forms of mobilities (e.g. automobility, virtual mobile communication technologies) not only create new opportunities for urban life, but also serve as one of the most critical components in the production of new exclusion and stratification. In conclusion, the article therefore suggests that future urban research and planning also need to apply the mobility perspective in order to understand the mechanisms between flows of movement and the understanding fixed spaces in the cities, and how different mobility systems play an important role in sustaining the exclusiveness that often characterizes private/public spaces. Likewise, from a mobility perspective, the specific consequences that the proprietary communities have on the surrounding communities seem to be an important further question for research and planning.
机译:在过去的几十年中,当代城市公共空间的私有化有所增加,但只有少数研究从移动性的角度探讨了这一趋势。因此,本文试图通过“机动性”的视角,探索澳大利亚在城市中的两个私人空间,封闭式社区和购物中心的实例,从而为这一领域做出贡献。这篇文章说明了不同的出行系统如何启用和/或限制公众对私人公共空间的访问,并指出专有社区为城市中的人员流动和访问创造了不平等的潜力。本文的主要论点是,许多出行系统都可以实现针对特定人口群体的场所的专业化。这意味着各种形式的交通(例如,汽车,虚拟移动通信技术)不仅为城市生活创造了新的机会,而且还成为产生新的排斥和分层的最关键组成部分之一。总之,本文因此建议,未来的城市研究和规划也需要应用流动性观点,以了解流动与理解城市固定空间之间的机制,以及不同的流动性系统如何在维持城市发展中发挥重要作用。通常代表私人/公共空间的排他性。同样,从流动性的角度来看,专有社区对周围社区的特定影响似乎是研究和规划的另一个重要问题。

著录项

  • 来源
    《International Planning Studies》 |2012年第3期|p.215-232|共18页
  • 作者

    METTE OLESEN; CLAUS LASSEN;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Development and Planning, Centre for Mobilities and Urban Studies (C-MUS), Aalborg University, Skibbrogade 5, DK 9000 Aalborg, Denmark;

    Department of Development and Planning, Centre for Mobilities and Urban Studies (C-MUS), Aalborg University, Skibbrogade 5, DK 9000 Aalborg, Denmark;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:25:52

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号