...
首页> 外文期刊>International Planning Studies >Should the public sector play a greater role funding brownfield redevelopment projects? A transatlantic comparison
【24h】

Should the public sector play a greater role funding brownfield redevelopment projects? A transatlantic comparison

机译:公共部门是否应该在资助棕地重建项目方面发挥更大的作用?跨大西洋比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In the US and Germany, various public funding tools are available to make brownfield redevelopment projects financially feasible. The practices of private or public sector involvement differ from an international perspective. The following discussion will explore funding practices in the US and Germany. In Germany, there is a long tradition of public sector involvement while the US is predominately driven by private sector funding. A comparison will help identify long-standing practices in Germany and how they might be adapted to the US context. In a manner similar to the previous chapter on policies and programs, findings in this chapter are discussed at federal US, state of Michigan and local municipal levels, and European Union, Germany, and local-level funding.
机译:在美国和德国,有各种公共资金工具可用于使棕地重建项目在财务上可行。从国际角度来看,私营或公共部门参与的做法有所不同。以下讨论将探讨美国和德国的融资实践。在德国,公共部门参与的传统由来已久,而美国则主要受私营部门资金的驱动。进行比较将有助于确定德国的长期做法,以及如何将其适应美国情况。与上一章有关政策和计划的方式类似,本章的结果在美国联邦,密歇根州和地方市政级别以及欧盟,德国和地方级别的资金中进行讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号