首页> 外文期刊>International Peacekeeping >Different Paths and Divergent Policies in the UN Security System: Brazil and Mexico in Comparative Perspective
【24h】

Different Paths and Divergent Policies in the UN Security System: Brazil and Mexico in Comparative Perspective

机译:联合国安全系统中的不同路径和不同政策:比较视角下的巴西和墨西哥

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

How can we explain foreign policy variation among UN member states? Brazil and Mexico are the most likely cases for international primacy in the UN system, given their territorial dimension, demographic tendencies, economic importance, geopolitical location and relative weight in Latin America. Yet, despite their structural similarities, their policies and behaviour in the UN system have varied, both in terms of engagement with the Security Council and commitment regarding peacekeeping. By comparing two of Latin America's most influential countries, this study identifies the underlying conditions and mechanisms that explain their differences in behaviour and policy in the UN. In particular, this article analyses and contrasts how geopolitics and civil-military relations in Brazil and Mexico affect their incentives to participate in international organizations and their overall international commitment to peace.
机译:我们如何解释联合国成员国之间的外交政策差异?鉴于巴西和墨西哥的地域范围,人口趋势,经济重要性,地缘政治位置以及在拉丁美洲的相对权重,它们在联合国系统中最有可能成为国际主导地位。然而,尽管它们在结构上有相似之处,但无论是在与安全理事会的接触还是在维持和平方面的承诺方面,它们在联合国系统内的政策和行为都各不相同。通过比较拉丁美洲两个最具影响力的国家,本研究确定了解释其在联合国行为和政策上的差异的基本条件和机制。特别是,本文分析并对比了巴西和墨西哥的地缘政治和军民关系如何影响其参与国际组织的动机以及它们对和平的总体国际承诺。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号