首页> 外文期刊>International Musculoskeletal Medicine >A randomised, placebo-controlled, clinical trial for the short-term effectiveness of manipulative therapy and acupuncture on pain caused by mechanical thoracic spine dysfunction
【24h】

A randomised, placebo-controlled, clinical trial for the short-term effectiveness of manipulative therapy and acupuncture on pain caused by mechanical thoracic spine dysfunction

机译:一项随机,安慰剂对照的临床试验,用于对针刺性机械性胸椎功能障碍引起的疼痛进行手法治疗和针刺的近期疗效

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: A randomised, assessor-blinded, placebo-controlled trial was used to compare the short-term effectiveness of manipulative therapy and acupuncture on the pain caused by mechanical thoracic spine dysfunction and on the pressure pain threshold. Subjects and Methods: The research sample consisted of 114 female patients aged 20-60 years. The primary complaint of these subjects had been pain in the thoracic spine area. After completing a questionnaire and undergoing a clinical examination, 114 subjects were diagnosed with mechanical thoracic spine dysfunction and these were randomised into the final study groups. Five persons dropped out the trial and thus the remaining 109 subjects were randomly divided into the manipulation group (n = 37), the acupuncture group (n = 35), and the placebo group (interference-electrotherapy with suction cups without electricity; n = 37). The subjects were treated four times with a 1-week follow-up assessment. The measurements of VAS and pressure pain threshold were taken on three occasions (baseline, before the second treatment and one week after the last treatment). The whole intervention took 4 weeks. Results: The VAS measurement performed one week after the last treatment indicated that manipulative therapy was superior to placebo (P-value 0.01). The intra-group results of the VAS measurements between the first and the last measurement revealed clinically significant pain reductions in all three groups. Pressure pain threshold values had increased in both the manipulation group and in the acupuncture group, whereas in the placebo group they had decreased, though the differences were not statistically significant. Conclusions: This trial suggests that manipulative therapy is more efficient than placebo in treating the pain caused by mechanical thoracic spine dysfunction when measured one week after the last treatment. In contrast, there was no significant difference between the effect of acupuncture and placebo.
机译:简介:采用一项随机,评估者盲目的安慰剂对照试验,比较了手法治疗和针刺对机械性胸椎功能不全引起的疼痛和压力性疼痛阈值的短期有效性。对象和方法:研究样本包括114位年龄在20至60岁之间的女性患者。这些受试者的主要主诉是胸椎区域的疼痛。完成调查表并进行临床检查后,有114名受试者被诊断出患有机械性胸椎功能障碍,并将其随机分为最终研究组。五人退出试验,因此将其余109名受试者随机分为操作组(n = 37),针灸组(n = 35)和安慰剂组(带无电吸盘的干扰电疗; n = 37)。受试者接受了为期1周的评估,共接受了四次治疗。在三种情况下(基线,第二次治疗前和最后一次治疗后一周)对VAS和压力疼痛阈值进行测量。整个干预过程耗时4周。结果:最后一次治疗后一周进行的VAS测量表明,手法治疗优于安慰剂(P值0.01)。第一个和最后一个测量之间的VAS测量的组内结果显示,所有三组的临床疼痛均明显减轻。压力疼痛阈值在手法治疗组和针刺组均增加,而在安慰剂组中,压力痛阈值降低,尽管差异在统计学上不显着。结论:该试验表明,在最后一次治疗后一周进行测量时,手法疗法比安慰剂更有效地治疗由机械性胸椎功能不全引起的疼痛。相反,针灸和安慰剂之间没有显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号