...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of urban and regional research >Building a Vision for the Post-Apartheid City: What Role for Participation in Johannesburg's City Development Strategy?
【24h】

Building a Vision for the Post-Apartheid City: What Role for Participation in Johannesburg's City Development Strategy?

机译:建立后种族隔离城市的愿景:参与约翰内斯堡城市发展战略的作用是什么?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In line with a broader 'participatory turn', the collective elaboration of city development strategies (CDSs) has become a leitmotiv in urban development planning, promising to deliver on both democracy-deepening and pro-poor concerns. Yet, this promise reposes on somewhat shaky grounds: much depends on the broader political opportunity structures within which CDSs are attempted. Using Johannesburg's recent experiment with city-wide strategic planning as a case study, this article explores the complex interplay between participatory processes and the broader political machinery of governance. In the messy terrain of late 1990s transition politics, Johannesburg's CDS can be read rather more as an instrument of the ruling ANC party's consolidation of power over the city, than as a 'genuine' attempt at collective strategic planning. However, this usurpation of participatory ideals did not entail the demise of equitable or even pro-poor concerns: more formal processes of participation, such as electoral representation and bureaucratic power, ensured the continued meshing of developmental concerns alongside growth imperatives at the heart of the CDS. The ambiguous relationship between newly entrenched routine participatory processes and the most recent - and arguably more equitable - review of the CDS, meanwhile, raises further questions about the actual function of participatory processes in urban governance.
机译:与更广泛的“参与性转变”相一致,城市发展战略(CDS)的集体拟定已成为城市发展规划的主旋律,并有望解决民主深化和扶贫问题。但是,这一承诺基于某种不稳定的理由:很大程度上取决于尝试CDS的更广泛的政治机会结构。本文以约翰内斯堡最近对全市战略规划的实验为案例研究,探讨了参与性过程与更广泛的治理政治机制之间的复杂相互作用。在1990年代后期过渡政治的凌乱地形中,约翰内斯堡的CDS可以理解为是执政的ANC政党巩固城市权力的工具,而不是作为“真正”的集体战略规划尝试。但是,这种对参与性理想的篡夺并没有消除公平甚至有利于穷人的关切:更正式的参与进程,例如选举代表和官僚权力,确保了发展关切与增长势在必行的核心问题的持续融合。 CDS。同时,新近确立的例行参与过程与CDS的最新审查(可能更为公平)之间的模棱两可的关系,进一步提出了有关参与过程在城市治理中的实际功能的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号