【24h】

Positively Radical

机译:积极激进

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Recent anxieties about the viability of critical and radical perspectives in urban research are part of our inheritance from the late 1960s and the backlash against a hegemony that connected positivist epistemology to quantitative methodologies and conservative, state-centric politics. In this article, I suggest that this memory relies on a caricature of positivist urbanism that creates a dangerous illusion of a tidy past when the cause was clear and it was easy to distinguish allies from adversaries. The linkages between epistemology, methodology and politics were unstable and contingent in positivism's heyday of the 1960s, and indeed at the birth of positivism itself. The contingent and contextual nexus of epistemology, method and politics offers abundant opportunities for new kinds of hybrids in radical, rigorous and relevant urban research.
机译:最近对城市研究中批判性和激进性观点的可行性的忧虑是我们从1960年代后期继承遗产的一部分,也是对将实证主义认识论与定量方法论和保守的,以国家为中心的政治联系在一起的霸权主义的强烈反对。在本文中,我建议这种记忆依赖于实证主义城市主义的讽刺漫画,当原因明确且很容易区分盟友与对手时,它会产生对整齐的过去的危险幻觉。认识论,方法论和政治之间的联系在实证主义的1960年代鼎盛时期,甚至在实证主义本身诞生之时就不稳定且偶然。认识论,方法和政治之间的偶然联系和上下文联系为激进,严格和相关的城市研究中的新型混合动力提供了丰富的机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号