...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of steel structures >Effect of Rib Geometry in Steel-Concrete Composite Beams with Deep Profiled Sheeting
【24h】

Effect of Rib Geometry in Steel-Concrete Composite Beams with Deep Profiled Sheeting

机译:钢筋混凝土复合梁肋几何形状与深刻的薄层

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Presented are the results from a finite element model of steel-concrete composite beams with deep decks and a comparison with various analytical/design methods. Using a deck deeper than 80 mm are becoming popular with a desire for longer spanning capability and lower concrete volume. However, there are no design rules in either American or European design codes for using a deck deeper than 80 mm, as both codes limit the deck rib height to 75 and 85 mm, respectively for using the stud's capacity formula. Therefore, research is needed to establish the design stud capacity in beams with decks deeper than 80 mm. After extensive validation, the 3-D FE model is used for a parametric study with tests having decks deeper than 80 mm. The parameters include rib geometries, studs' layout and concrete slab reinforcements. The FE results showed that stud capacity with narrow and deep decks (100-150 mm) is about 70% of the conventional decking (60-80 mm deep). The stud capacities from the numerical results were compared to the predicted strengths from the design/theoretical models. While the equations from the concrete pull-out failure mode by Johnson and Yuan (Proc Inst Civ Eng Struct Build 128(3):252-263, 1998) gave reasonable predictions with a coefficient of variation as 11%, both EC4 and ANSI/AISC rules provided inaccurate and inconsistent predicted strengths. A generalised stud capacity formula should be developed in the design codes for decks deeper than 80 mm.
机译:提出是具有深层甲板的钢混凝土复合梁的有限元模型的结果,以及与各种分析/设计方法的比较。使用比80毫米更深的甲板正在遭受对跨越能力和更低的混凝土体积的渴望。然而,美国或欧洲设计代码中没有设计规则,使用甲板比80毫米更深,因为两种代码分别将甲板肋高度限制为75和85 mm,以使用螺柱容量公式。因此,需要研究以在甲板上建立设计螺柱容量,甲板比80毫米更深。经过大量验证后,3-D FE模型用于参数研究,具有甲板深于80毫米的甲板。参数包括肋骨几何形状,螺柱布局和混凝土板增强剂。 FE结果表明,具有窄和深甲板(100-150 mm)的螺柱容量约为传统装饰的70%(深度60-80毫米)。将来自数值结果的螺柱容量与来自设计/理论模型的预测强度进行比较。虽然Johnson和Yuan的具体拉出失败模式的方程(Prog Inst Civ Eng Struct 128(3):252-263,1998)使得可合理的预测,其变异系数为11%,均为EC4和ANSI / AISC规则提供了不准确和不一致的预测优势。广义螺柱容量配方应在甲板的设计代码中开发,甲板深于80毫米。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号