首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of STD & AIDS >Risk profile of walk-in triage compared with an appointment-based phone-triage evening clinic
【24h】

Risk profile of walk-in triage compared with an appointment-based phone-triage evening clinic

机译:与预约式电话分诊夜间诊所相比,门诊分诊的风险特征

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The aim of this study is to compare risk factors in new clients attending the walk-in triage-based day clinic (WITS) to those attending a telephone-triage appointment-based evening clinic of a sexual health service. The method involves an audit of computerized medical records of new clients attending between July 2002 and December 2007. There were 37,833 new clients of which 37,223 (98.4%) attended WITS and 610 (1.6%) attended the evening clinic. WITS clients were significantly older (31% vs. 30%, P < 0.041), more likely to be male (58% vs. 43%, P < 0.001), sex workers (6% vs. 3%, P < 0.001), not employed (34% vs. 10%, P < 0.001), diagnosed with gonorrhoea (1.7% vs. 0.7%, P < 0.041), herpes (4% vs. 2%, P < 0.000), non-specific urethritis (6% vs. 2%, P < 0.000) and less likely asymptomatic (35.1% vs. 53.4%, P < 0.001). Men attending WITS had significantly more female partners in the 12 months (3.9 vs. 3.0, P < 0.001), but other risks were similar in both clinics. A telephone-triage appointment-based evening clinic is important for asymptomatic high-risk individuals.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较就诊于分诊式日间诊所(WITS)的新客户与就诊于电话分诊式性保健晚间诊所的客户的危险因素。该方法包括对2002年7月至2007年12月之间新来访者的计算机病历进行审计。共有37,833名新来访者,其中37,223名(98.4%)参加了WITS,610名(1.6%)参加了夜间诊所。 WITS的客户年龄较大(31%比30%,P <0.041),男性(58%比43%,P <0.001),性工作者(6%对3%,P <0.001)的可能性更大。 ,未就业(34%比10%,P <0.001),诊断为淋病(1.7%比0.7%,P <0.041),疱疹(4%比2%,P <0.000),非特异性尿道炎(6%vs. 2%,P <0.000)和不太可能无症状的情况(35.1%vs. 53.4%,P <0.001)。参加WITS的男性在12个月内有更多的女性伴侣(3.9比3.0,P <0.001),但是两个诊所的其他风险相似。基于电话分诊预约的夜间诊所对于无症状的高危个体很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号