首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Social Economics >The measurement of inequality in Fiji's household income distribution Some empirical results
【24h】

The measurement of inequality in Fiji's household income distribution Some empirical results

机译:斐济家庭收入分配中的不平等程度的测度一些经验结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - Measures of inequality determine the effectiveness of social and economic policies aimed at reducing inequality and to design effective intervention policies. The purpose of this paper is to focus on poverty reduction and welfare improving impacts of reducing income inequality in the case of Fiji. Using Fiji's Household Income and Expenditure Survey 2002-2003, a comprehensive analysis is used to measure the level of inequality by household income, quintile income distribution, decomposition of inequality by ethnicity and regional groups, and the household income inequality by source of income. Design/methodology/approach - Several statistical techniques have been applied to investigate the degree of inequality in the household income. These include the Gini coefficient, the Nelson ratio, the concentration index and the Atkinson index. An evaluation by ethnicity, regions and household income sources reflects the level of inequality, and concerns for policies and governance. Findings - The results show that urban households, in particular, experience greater inequalities, in both positive and normative terms. The Indo-Fijian households experience greater income inequalities than the Fijian households. Decomposition results for the separate factor income components also indicate major sources of inequality. These findings clearly establish that Fiji still has a long way to go in reducing the income gaps between the rich and the poor in both rural and urban households. Originality/value - The paper is a first study that estimates various measures of inequality in the case of Fiji. The implication of the empirical findings suggests that Fiji is unlikely to achieve its Millennium Development Goal of halving poverty rate by 2015 due to the large income differentials by ethnicity and in the urban-rural areas.
机译:目的-不平等的衡量标准决定旨在减少不平等并设计有效干预政策的社会和经济政策的有效性。本文的目的是集中于减少贫困和改善福利,以减少斐济收入不平等的影响。使用斐济的《 2002-2003年家庭收入和支出调查》,进行了一项综合分析,用于衡量按家庭收入划分的不平等程度,五分位数的收入分布,按种族和地区群体划分的不平等现象以及按收入来源划分的家庭收入不平等程度。设计/方法/方法-几种统计技术已用于调查家庭收入中的不平等程度。这些包括基尼系数,尼尔森比率,集中指数和阿特金森指数。按种族,地区和家庭收入来源进行的评估反映了不平等程度,以及对政策和治理的关注。研究结果-结果表明,无论是在积极方面还是在规范方面,城市家庭尤其面临更大的不平等现象。印度裔斐济家庭比斐济家庭遭受更大的收入不平等。各个要素收入组成部分的分解结果也表明了不平等的主要根源。这些发现清楚地表明,斐济在缩小城乡居民的贫富差距方面还有很长的路要走。原创性/价值-该论文是第一项研究,它估计了斐济案例中各种不平等程度。实证结果表明,斐济不太可能实现其到2015年将贫困率降低一半的千年发展目标,因为族裔和城乡地区的收入差距很大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号