首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement >Young Adults’ Accounts of Scientific Knowledge When Responding to a Television News Report of Contested Science
【24h】

Young Adults’ Accounts of Scientific Knowledge When Responding to a Television News Report of Contested Science

机译:年轻人对有争议科学的电视新闻报道的回应时对科学知识的描述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper reports one aspect of a study of 28 young adults (18-26 years) engaging with the uncertain (contested) science of a television news report about recent research into mobile phone health risks. The aim of the study was to examine these young people’s ‘accounts of scientific knowledge’ in this context. Seven groups of friends responded to the news report, initially in focus group discussions. Later in semi-structured interviews they elaborated their understanding of the nature of science through their explanations of the scientists’ disagreement and described their mobile phone safety risk assessments. This paper presents their accounts in terms of their views of the nature of science and their concept understanding. Discussions were audio-recorded then analysed by coding the talk in terms of issues raised, which were grouped into themes and interpreted in terms of a moderate social constructionist theoretical framing. In this context, most participants expressed a ‘common sense’ view of the nature of science, describing it as an atheoretical, technical procedure of scientists testing their personal opinions on the issue, subject to the influence of funding sponsors. The roles of theory and data interpretation were largely ignored. It is argued that the nature of science understanding is crucial to engagement with contemporary socioscientific issues, particularly the roles of argumentation, theory, data interpretation, and the distinction of science from common sense. Implications for school science relate primarily to nature of science teaching and the inclusion of socioscientific issues in school science curricula. Future research directions are considered.View full textDownload full textKeywordsNature of science, Scientific literacy, Science education, Socioscientific issues, Decision-makingRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2010.548658
机译:本文报道了一项针对28名年轻人(18-26岁)的研究的一个方面,该研究涉及有关电视健康风险的最新研究的电视新闻报道的不确定(有争议)科学。该研究的目的是在这种情况下检查这些年轻人的“科学知识”。七个小组的朋友对新闻报道做出了回应,最初是在焦点小组讨论中。稍后,在半结构化访谈中,他们通过解释科学家的分歧,阐述了对科学本质的理解,并描述了他们的手机安全风险评估。本文以他们对科学本质和概念理解的观点来介绍他们的观点。对讨论进行音频记录,然后根据提出的问题对讲话进行编码,将其分组,然后按主题进行分类,并根据适度的社会建构主义理论框架进行解释。在这种情况下,大多数参与者表达了对科学本质的“常识”观点,并将其描述为科学家在受资助者影响下测试其个人观点的一种理论,技术方法。理论和数据解释的作用在很大程度上被忽略了。有人认为,科学理解的本质对于参与当代社会科学问题至关重要,特别是论证,理论,数据解释以及科学与常识的区别的作用。对学校科学的影响主要与科学教学的性质有关,并将社会科学问题纳入学校科学课程中。考虑未来的研究方向。查看全文下载全文关键字科学的性质,科学素养,科学教育,社会科学问题,决策制定相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,service_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati, Delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2010.548658

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号