首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Rough Sets and Date Analysis >Impact of PDS Based kNN Classifiers on Kyoto Dataset
【24h】

Impact of PDS Based kNN Classifiers on Kyoto Dataset

机译:基于PDS的kNN分类器对Kyoto数据集的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This article compares the performance of different Partial Distance Search-based (PDS) kNN classifiers on a benchmark Kyoto 2006+ dataset for Network Intrusion Detection Systems (NIDS). These PDS classifiers are named based on features indexing. They are: i) Simple PDS kNN, the features are not indexed (SPDS), ii) Variance indexing based kNN (VIPDS), the features are indexed by the variance of the features, and iii) Correlation coefficient indexing-based kNN (CIPDS), the features are indexed by the correlation coefficient of the features with a class label. For comparative study between these classifiers, the computational time and accuracy are considered performance measures. After the experimental study, it is observed that the CIPDS gives better performance in terms of computational time whereas VIPDS shows better accuracy, but not much significant difference when compared with CIPDS. The study suggests to adopt CIPDS when class labels were available without any ambiguity, otherwise it suggested the adoption of VIPDS.
机译:本文在基准京都2006+数据集的网络入侵检测系统(NIDS)上比较了不同的基于局部距离搜索(PDS)的kNN分类器的性能。这些PDS分类器是基于要素索引命名的。它们是:i)简单PDS kNN,未对特征进行索引(SPDS),ii)基于方差索引的kNN(VIPDS),通过特征的方差对特征进行索引,以及iii)基于相关系数索引的kNN(CIPDS ),则通过具有类别标签的特征的相关系数来索引特征。为了在这些分类器之间进行比较研究,将计算时间和准确性视为性能指标。经过实验研究,可以观察到CIPDS在计算时间方面具有更好的性能,而VIPDS显示出更好的准确性,但是与CIPDS相比并没有太大的显着差异。该研究建议在没有类别歧义的情况下采用CIPDS,否则建议采用VIPDS。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号