Do soil-adjusted or standard vegetation indices better predict above ground biomass of semi-arid, saline rangelands in North-East Iran?

摘要

Satellite remote sensing has greatly facilitated the assessment of aboveground biomass in rangelands. Soil-adjusted vegetation indices have been developed to provide better predictions of aboveground biomass, especially for dryland regions. Semi-arid rangelands often complicate a remote sensing based assessment of aboveground biomass due to bright reflecting soils combined with sparse vegetation cover. We aim at evaluating whether soil-adjusted vegetation indices perform better than standard, i.e. unadjusted, vegetation indices in predicting dry aboveground biomass of a saline and semi-arid rangeland in NE-Iran. 672 biomass plots of 2 x 2 m were gathered and aggregated into 13 sites. Generalized Linear Regression Models (GLM) were compared for six different vegetation indices, three standard and three soil-adjusted vegetation indices. Vegetation indices were calculated from the MODIS MCD43A4 product. Model comparison was done using Akaike Information Criterion (AICc), Akaike weights and pseudo R-2. Model fits for dry biomass showed that transformed NDVI and NDVI fitted best with R-2 = 0.47 and R-2 = 0.33, respectively. The optimized soil-adjusted vegetation index (OSAVI) behaved similar to NDVI but less precise. The soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI), the modified soil-adjusted vegetation index (MSAVI2) and the enhanced vegetation index (EVI) performed worse than a null model. Hence, soil-adjusted indices based on the soil-line concept performed worse than a simple square root transformation of the NDVI. However, more studies that compare MODIS based vegetation indices for rangeland biomass estimation are required to support our findings. We suggest applying a similar model comparison approach as performed in this study instead of relying on single vegetation indices in order to find optimal relationships with aboveground biomass estimation in rangelands.