首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Refugee Law >Redundant or Essential? How Politics Shaped the Outcome of the 1967 Protocol
【24h】

Redundant or Essential? How Politics Shaped the Outcome of the 1967 Protocol

机译:冗余还是基本?政治如何塑造1967年议定书的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees has been described as an unnecessary addendum to the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees. However, if the 1967 Protocol was superfluous, why did the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees in the early 1960s insist on its development? This article seeks to establish that the 1967 Protocol was originally intended to encompass the broader concerns of African and Asian states concerning refugee populations in their region. However, the political influence upon the development of international refugee law radically altered the UNHCR's endeavour to make the 1951 Convention universally accessible.
机译:1967年《关于难民地位的议定书》被描述为1951年《关于难民地位的公约》的不必要的增编。但是,如果1967年议定书是多余的,为什么联合国难民事务高级专员在1960年代初坚持要求其发展呢?本文力求确定,《 1967年议定书》最初旨在涵盖非洲和亚洲国家对本地区难民人口的更广泛关注。但是,对国际难民法发展的政治影响从根本上改变了难民署的努力,使《 1951年公约》普及。

著录项

  • 来源
    《International Journal of Refugee Law》 |2007年第4期|703-728|共26页
  • 作者

    Sara E. Davies;

  • 作者单位

    Dr Sara E. Davies is a lecturer at the School of Justice Faculty of Law Queensland University of Technology Australia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号