首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education >The case of the noble savage: the myth that governance can replace leadership
【24h】

The case of the noble savage: the myth that governance can replace leadership

机译:高尚野蛮的案例:治理可以取代领导层的神话

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The presumption of American’s noble savage provides the foundation for the creation of one of the world’s most recognizable stereotypes - the American Indian. The stereotype, lodged in the minds of most Americans as the Plains Indian warrior, contributed to decades of misunderstanding about leadership in traditional American Indian societies and governance in contemporary American Indian tribes. Review of both indigenous leadership styles and governance structure, defined as Public Law 93-638 or the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act of 1975 (25 USC 450), will provide the framework for a critical analysis of culture and American Indian leadership and governance. We argue that the individualist and democratic culture of white America has generated a particular approach to American Indians that promotes western governance systems at the expense of indigenous leadership cultures. In this approach, the nature of American Indians is reduced to an interpretation of the “noble savage” in which their either anarchic or tyrannical culture can only be tamed by the imposition of western governance systems. This implies displacing the indigenous cultures of leadership with the “universal” culture of democracy. This article will provide the context for discussions on the myth of self-determination, a construct of governance, and the indigenous leadership roles which continue to struggle against assimilation, cultural appropriation, and a history of genocidal policies. After comparing and contrasting indigenous concepts with western notions of governance, the authors propose a series of questions about the fundamental assumptions of governance in contemporary affairs.View full textDownload full textKeywordsAmerican Indian, governance, leadershipRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2012.720736
机译:美国人崇高野蛮的推定为创造世界上最知名的刻板印象之一-美洲印第安人奠定了基础。在大多数美国人心目中的刻板印象是平原印第安战士,这导致数十年来人们对传统美洲印第安人社会的领导能力和当代美洲印第安人部落的治理产生了误解。对土著领导风格和治理结构(定义为《 93-638公法》或1975年《印度自决和教育援助法》(25 USC 450))的审查,将为文化和美洲印第安人领导力的批判性分析提供框架。治理。我们认为,白人美国的个人主义和民主文化对美洲印第安人产生了一种特殊的方法,即以牺牲土著领导文化为代价来促进西方治理体系。通过这种方式,美洲印第安人的本性被简化为对“贵族野蛮人”的一种解释,在这种解释中,他们的无政府或暴政文化只能通过施加西方治理制度来加以驯服。这意味着用“普遍的”民主文化代替土著领导文化。本文将为讨论自决的神话,治理的结构以及继续与同化,文化侵占和种族灭绝政策斗争的土著领导角色提供讨论的背景。在将土著概念与西方治理概念进行比较和对比之后,作者提出了一系列有关当代事务中治理基本假设的问题。查看全文下载全文关键字美洲印第安人,治理,领导力相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,可口,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2012.720736

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号