首页> 外文期刊>International journal of public sector management >Political governance and(account)ability of private universities in developing countries
【24h】

Political governance and(account)ability of private universities in developing countries

机译:发展中国家私立大学的政治治理和(会计)能力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - Due to scarcity of research in governance and accountability in private higher education in developing countries, the purpose of this paper is to explore the tensions surrounding good governance in legitimizing accountability in private universities in developing countries with reference to Bangladesh. Design/methodology/approach - Mixed methods are employed: a quantitative survey of 1,576 students from all 79 private universities; qualitative interviews with 23 stakeholders; and policy documents including the Private University Acts, the World Bank Report and newspapers (1992-2015) were evaluated. The objectives of these mixed methods in this study are juxtaposed and generate complementary insights that together create a bigger picture surrounding governance and accountability issues. Findings - Using Clark's (1983) triangle model (i.e. state control, academic oligarchy, and market forces together with the external influence of donors and boards of trustees as internal governance) and new institutional theory (DiMaggio and Powell, 1983), the major contributions of this study are explaining the root causes of the poor governance of private universities through three related factors: the substantial political power and autonomy held by boards of trustees; a lack of enforcement of Private University Act; and a lack of coordination among stakeholders. The coercive power of the state becomes powerless since the board of trustees ultimately enjoys political power and "does whatever it can." The lack of coordination of the academic oligarchy (e.g. professors and academics) and market forces (represented by students) by the board of trustees creates a paradox of governance and hence a decoupling of formal policies and actual practice. Practical implications - The findings have major policy implications for local and international policymakers for improving good governance in private universities in developing countries. Originality/value - The novelty of the study's findings represents an initial effort to understand the complex and persistent phenomenon of prolonged poor governance of private universities in developing countries, which is largely neglected in the literature. This will undoubtedly contribute to literature and policy implications.
机译:目的-由于发展中国家私立高等教育的治理和问责制研究不足,因此本文的目的是探究围绕孟加拉国在使发展中国家私立大学的问责制合法化方面的良治问题。设计/方法/方法-采用混合方法:对来自所有79所私立大学的1,576名学生进行了定量调查;对23个利益相关者进行定性访谈;评估了包括《私立大学法》,《世界银行报告》和报纸(1992-2015年)在内的政策文件。这些混合方法在本研究中的目标是并列的,并产生互补的见解,这些见解共同构成了围绕治理和问责制问题的更大图景。研究结果-使用克拉克(1983)的三角模型(即国家控制,学术寡头和市场力量以及捐助者和受托人董事会的外部影响作为内部治理)和新的制度理论(DiMaggio和Powell,1983年)这项研究的结果通过三个相关因素解释了私立大学治理不善的根本原因:董事会具有强大的政治权力和自主权;缺乏对《私立大学法》的执行;利益相关者之间缺乏协调。由于董事会最终享有政治权力并“竭尽所能”,因此国家的强制力变得无能为力。董事会缺乏学术寡头(例如教授和学者)和市场力量(由学生代表)的协调,这造成了治理的悖论,从而使正式政策与实际做法脱节。实际意义-研究结果对地方和国际决策者改善发展中国家私立大学的善治具有重大政策意义。原创性/价值-该研究结果的新颖性是人们为理解发展中国家私立大学长期管治不良而长期存在的复杂而持久的现象所做的初步努力,而这一现象在文献中已被忽略。无疑,这将对文学和政策产生影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号