首页> 外文期刊>International journal of public sector management >Comparative financing of megacities in multi-level BRICS states
【24h】

Comparative financing of megacities in multi-level BRICS states

机译:金砖四国各州的特大城市比较融资

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - The BRICS states are based on multi-level government's architecture whose megacities have an outstanding role in their respective states - not only in terms of population and in terms of economic power, but also in terms of local own-tax revenue collection, which, in turn, implies a very strong administration. At the same time, megacities are facing increasing public expenditures because of infrastructure needs, housing shortage, growth of social inequality, and environmental degradation. In order to outweigh the urban advantages associated with urbanization, reconsidering the fiscal framework is of urgent need. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach - Most similar case design is applied. Findings - Megacities are at the forefront of national economic growth, that they have an above average tax base, an excellent administration, and therefore, face above average yields of property tax revenues. Rethinking the fiscal framework could considerably improve local finances. Research limitations/implications - Due to limitations on public finance statistics, the sample draws on four megacities in BRICS, in reference to all megacities, only. Practical implications - In context of Habitat III, New Urban Agenda, the practical implications are manyfold: the paper focuses on megacities, its finances (financing for development), and social implications involved. Social implications - Local public finance, especially property taxation, has many implications on social level. Originality/value - The paper is one in a kind.
机译:目的-金砖国家建立在多级政府的架构之上,其特大城市在各自的州中发挥着杰出的作用-不仅在人口和经济实力方面,而且在地方自税收入征收方面,反过来,则意味着一个非常强大的政府。同时,由于基础设施需求,住房短缺,社会不平等加剧和环境恶化,大城市面临的公共支出正在增加。为了超越与城市化相关的城市优势,迫切需要重新考虑财政框架。本文旨在讨论这些问题。设计/方法/方法-应用最相似的案例设计。调查结果-特大城市处于国民经济增长的最前沿,他们的税基高于平均水平,拥有出色的行政管理,因此面临着高于平均水平的财产税收益。重新考虑财政框架可以大大改善地方财政状况。研究的局限性/意义-由于公共财政统计的局限性,本样本仅借鉴了金砖国家中的四个特大城市。实际含义-在《新城市议程》人居三的背景下,实际含义是多方面的:本文着眼于特大城市,其融资(发展筹资)以及所涉及的社会影响。社会影响-地方公共财政,特别是财产税,对社会水平有许多影响。原创性/价值-论文是一种。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号