...
首页> 外文期刊>The International Journal of Productivity and performance management >Supply chain practices: A content analysis in empirical research and framework for future development
【24h】

Supply chain practices: A content analysis in empirical research and framework for future development

机译:供应链实践:实证研究的内容分析和未来发展的框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to perform content analysis in empirical research in supply chain practices (SCPs) over the last 16 years. The research also aims to identify implications for future research in the area of SCPs. Design/methodology/approach - The review of SCPs research is based on 382 papers published from 1997 to 2012 in the 16 selected journals. The state of research is assessed by examining the empirical research growth of SCPs in selected journals, empirical research growth of SCPs, country of sample industry, sample industry, issues discussed in SCPs literature, purpose/objective of research, research method, response rate and data analysis techniques. The research gap is identified through reviewing the selected practices and framework for future development is proposed. Findings - The empirical research in SCPs predominantly performs in the developed countries like USA, UK and Spain. A significant percentage of articles contribute towards the effect of SCPs on organizational performance, but majority of authors employed performance analysis for at firm level only. Hypothesis testing is seemed to be very a common method of defining research question. From the content analysis, it is found that the response rate for the survey research is very low. The trend in survey research is shifting from descriptive statistics' to framework building and testing. Research limitations/implications - This paper focuses only the identifications of SCPs and content analysis in empirical research. Further empirical study can be undertaken to find out the relationship between different SCPs and their effect on the organizational performance. Practical implications - The methodological review will provide better understanding of the current state of research in the area of SCPs. Originality/value - Many literature reviews aim at critical examination of supply chain management (SCM), but none of them focused the empirical research in SCPs. Another unique feature of this paper is that, it represents 382 articles from 16 selected journals over the past 16 years.
机译:目的-本文的目的是在过去16年的供应链实践(SCP)实证研究中进行内容分析。该研究还旨在确定对SCP领域未来研究的影响。设计/方法/方法-对SCPs研究的回顾基于1997年至2012年在16种精选期刊上发表的382篇论文。通过检查选定期刊中SCP的经验研究增长,SCP的经验研究增长,样本行业的国家,样本行业,SCP文献中讨论的问题,研究的目的/目的,研究方法,回复率和数据分析技术。通过审查选定的实践和提出的未来发展框架来确定研究差距。研究结果-SCP的实证研究主要在美国,英国和西班牙等发达国家进行。很大一部分文章对SCP对组织绩效的影响做出了贡献,但是大多数作者仅在公司级别采用绩效分析。假设检验似乎是定义研究问题的非常普遍的方法。从内容分析中发现,调查研究的答复率很低。调查研究的趋势正在从描述性统计转变为框架构建和测试。研究局限性/含义-本文仅在实证研究中着重研究SCP的识别和内容分析。可以进行进一步的经验研究,以找出不同SCP之间的关系及其对组织绩效的影响。实际意义-方法论回顾将提供对SCP领域当前研究状态的更好理解。原创性/价值-许​​多文献评论都旨在对供应链管理(SCM)进行严格审查,但没有一篇文献聚焦于SCP的实证研究。本文的另一个独特之处在于,它代表了过去16年中来自16种精选期刊的382条文章。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号