首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Production Research >Inserting cost effectiveness to the ergonomic equation when considering practical solutions
【24h】

Inserting cost effectiveness to the ergonomic equation when considering practical solutions

机译:在考虑实际解决方案时将成本效益插入人体工程学方程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

From a practical point of view, the cost effectiveness of ergonomic solutions is often questioned. Many times managers omit ergonomic solutions because of their high cost. This paper introduces a way to implement cost effective ergonomic solutions by coupling computer-aided design and predetermined motion time systems. This is done by generating a comparison between the operation times and body motions used in existing and safer work situations. We demonstrate using two case studies how solutions may impact operation times and stress, to which workers are subjected, which may be expressed in relaxation allowances required for resting and recovery. The 'final product' which may interest management the most, the ergonomic recommendations, is presented in easy to understand figures and numbers, including time to return on investment on relevant ergonomic solutions, which becomes possible when suggested improvements to work-situations are translated to time and cost.
机译:从实践的角度来看,人体工程学解决方案的成本效益经常受到质疑。很多时候,管理人员由于成本高而忽略了人体工程学解决方案。本文介绍了一种通过结合计算机辅助设计和预定的运动时间系统来实施具有成本效益的人体工程学解决方案的方法。这是通过在现有和更安全的工作情况下生成的操作时间和身体运动之间进行比较来完成的。我们使用两个案例研究证明了解决方案如何影响工人的工作时间和压力,这可以用休息和恢复所需的放松津贴来表示。人体工程学的建议是最可能引起管理兴趣的“最终产品”,以易于理解的数字和数字表示,包括在相关人体工程学解决方案上的投资回报时间,当将对工作环境的建议改进翻译为时间和成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号