首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Production Research >Simulation-based performance comparison between dynamic cells, classical cells and job shops: a case study
【24h】

Simulation-based performance comparison between dynamic cells, classical cells and job shops: a case study

机译:动态单元格,经典单元格和车间之间基于仿真的性能比较:一个案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper presents the results of a simulation-based performance comparison between dynamic cellular (DC) manufacturing systems and two other well-known systems, namely classical cells (CC) and job shop systems (JS). The performance comparison is made at different levels of turbulence. The experiment contains 13 independent variables, most of them related to demand turbulence, and 17 dependant variables related to performance measure. A stochastic simulation model developed on Microsoft Visual FoxPro 5.0 was used in combination with LINDO (a linear/integer programming software) to obtain the initial results. In view of the large number of variables and the time required to run each experiment, a Taguchi plan was used to optimize the model. The results obtained from the analysis of variance indicate that dynamic cellular manufacturing systems are generally more efficient than classical cellular systems or job shop systems, especially with respect to the average and maximum throughput time, mean and maximum work-in-process, mean and maximum tardiness, and the total marginal cost for a given horizon.
机译:本文介绍了动态蜂窝(DC)制造系统与其他两个著名系统,即经典蜂窝(CC)和作业车间系统(JS)之间基于仿真的性能比较的结果。在不同的湍流水平下进行性能比较。该实验包含13个自变量,其中大多数与需求动荡有关,而17个因变量与绩效指标有关。在Microsoft Visual FoxPro 5.0上开发的随机仿真模型与LINDO(线性/整数编程软件)结合使用以获得初始结果。鉴于大量变量和运行每个实验所需的时间,使用了Taguchi计划来优化模型。从方差分析获得的结果表明,动态蜂窝制造系统通常比传统蜂窝系统或车间系统更有效,特别是在平均和最大吞吐时间,平均和最大在制品,平均和最大方面迟到性以及给定范围内的总边际成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号