...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Production Research >Pricing and ordering decisions of two competing supply chains with different composite policies: a Stackelberg game-theoretic approach
【24h】

Pricing and ordering decisions of two competing supply chains with different composite policies: a Stackelberg game-theoretic approach

机译:具有不同复合策略的两个竞争供应链的定价和订购决策:Stackelberg博弈论方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In today's global highly competitive markets, competition happens among supply chains instead of companies, as the members of supply chains. So, the partners of the chains seek to apply efficient coordinating strategies like discount, return, refund, buyback, or the other coordinating policies to abate the operation costs of the chains and subsequently increase market shares. Hence, because of the importance and application of these strategies in the current non-exclusive markets, in this study, we introduce different composite coordinating strategies to enhance the coordination of the supply chains. Here, we consider two competing supply chains where both chains launch the same product under different brands to the market by applying different composite coordinating strategies. Each supply chain comprises one manufacturer and a group of non-competing retailers where the manufacturer receives raw materials from an outside supplier and transforms them into a finished product; then, the products are sold to the retailers to satisfy the demands of market. In the first chain, a composite (QFF) policy, which is the combination of quantity and freight discount, as well as free shipping quantity policies, are considered between upstream and downstream members while in the second one, different composite polices are considered between upstream and downstream members such that the supplier offers a composite policy, as the first chain, to the manufacturer and the manufacturer proposes a composite (QPR) policy, which is the combination of quantity discount and partial-refund customer return policies, to the retailers. The main objective of the paper is to determine the optimal selling prices and the order quantities of the manufacturer and the retailers in each chain in presence of different composite coordinating strategies. A Stackelberg game-theoretic approach is employed between the members of each chain where the manufacturer is a follower and the retailers are leaders. The concavity of profit functions is proved. Finally, the applicability of the models is justified by presented numerical examples. Moreover, the effects of these strategies on the decisions of the chains' partners are examined.
机译:在当今全球竞争激烈的市场中,作为供应链成员的竞争发生在供应链之间,而不是公司之间。因此,连锁店的合作伙伴寻求应用有效的协调策略,例如折扣,退货,退款,回购或其他协调策略,以减少连锁店的运营成本并随后增加市场份额。因此,由于这些策略在当前非排他性市场中的重要性和应用,因此在本研究中,我们引入了不同的复合协调策略来增强供应链的协调。在这里,我们考虑两个竞争的供应链,这两个供应链都通过应用不同的复合协调策略将不同品牌的同一产品推向市场。每个供应链包括一个制造商和一组无竞争的零售商,制造商从外部供应商那里接收原材料并将其转化为成品;然后,将产品出售给零售商以满足市场需求。在第一个链中,上游和下游成员之间考虑了一个综合(QFF)策略,即数量和运费折扣的组合,以及免费运输数量策略,而在第二个链中,上游之间考虑了不同的复合策略下游成员,以便供应商向制造商提供第一条综合政策,而制造商则向零售商提出综合(QPR)政策,即数量折扣和部分退款客户退货政策的组合。本文的主要目的是在存在不同的复合协调策略的情况下,确定每个链中制造商和零售商的最佳销售价格和订单数量。在每个链的成员之间采用Stackelberg博弈论方法,其中制造商是追随者,零售商是领导者。证明了利润函数的凹性。最后,通过给出的数值例子证明了模型的适用性。此外,还研究了这些策略对连锁合作伙伴决策的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号