首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Production Research >Two strategies for dynamic perishable product pricing to consider in strategic consumer behaviour
【24h】

Two strategies for dynamic perishable product pricing to consider in strategic consumer behaviour

机译:战略性消费者行为中应考虑的两种动态易腐产品定价策略

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The study investigates two dynamic pricing strategies, namely posterior price matching (PM) and delay posterior price matching (DPM). These strategies are used by sellers to consider consumer behaviour in a market with several types of consumers. We analyze reduction season price, purchasing equilibrium and regular selling season price using equilibrium theory and backward induction method. A comparison of these two strategies indicates that both PM and DPM enable sellers to increase price in a regular selling season. Hassle cost and valuation differences between high- and low-end consumers influence the profits and decisions of the seller. PM is the best choice when valuations of low- and high-end consumers vary significantly. When the strategic consumer delaying fraction is small, the advantages of PM are more evident than those of DPM. However, DPM is the best choice when the difference between the valuations of low- and high-end consumers is small, and the strategic consumer delaying fraction is large. An increase in hassle cost also affects the seller's strategy choice and profits; this effect decreases as strategic consumer delaying fraction increases.
机译:该研究调查了两种动态定价策略,即后验价格匹配(PM)和延迟后验价格匹配(DPM)。卖方使用这些策略来考虑具有几种类型的消费者的市场中的消费者行为。我们使用均衡理论和后向归纳法分析了减少季节价格,购买均衡和常规销售季节价格。两种策略的比较表明,PM和DPM均使卖方能够在常规销售季节提高价格。高端消费者和低端消费者之间麻烦的成本和估值差异会影响卖方的利润和决策。当低端和高端消费者的估值差异很大时,PM是最佳选择。当战略性消费者延迟比例较小时,PM的优势比DPM的优势更为明显。但是,当低端和高端消费者的估值之间的差异较小且战略性消费者延迟比例较大时,DPM是最佳选择。麻烦成本的增加也会影响卖方的策略选择和利润。随着战略性消费者延迟比例的增加,这种影响会降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号