...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Portfolio Analysis and Management >How good are the investment options provided by defined contribution plan sponsors?
【24h】

How good are the investment options provided by defined contribution plan sponsors?

机译:定额供款计划发起人提供的投资选择有多好?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We investigate the quality of the investment choices that sponsors of defined contribution plans offer to plan participants for their retirement portfolios. Using a unique database of over 30,000 plans, we calculate the performance of equity-oriented investment options that were included in plans compared to a sample of funds that were not. On average, plan options produce annualised risk-adjusted returns exceeding those of non-plan options by as much as 120 basis points, an outcome that is relatively insensitive to factor model specifications, time period, or investment style classification. This performance advantage is largely due to actively managed plan options; privately managed institutional funds do not appear to enjoy any incremental performance advantage relative to public mutual funds. We conclude that plan sponsors do appear to possess superior selection skills when designing the set of investment options offered to plan participants.
机译:我们调查定额供款计划的发起人提供的投资选择的质量,以计划参与者的退休投资组合。使用包含30,000多个计划的独特数据库,我们计算了计划中包含的以股票为导向的投资选择的绩效,而没有选择的基金样本,则计算了该绩效。平均而言,计划期权产生的年度调整风险收益比非计划期权高出120个基点,这一结果对因子模型规格,时间段或投资风格分类相对不敏感。这种性能优势主要归功于积极管理的计划选项;相对于公共共同基金,私人管理的机构基金似乎没有任何增量的绩效优势。我们得出的结论是,在设计为计划参与者提供的一组投资选择时,计划发起人似乎确实具有较高的选择技巧。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号