首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society >The Social Scientist as Public Intellectual in an Age of Mass Media
【24h】

The Social Scientist as Public Intellectual in an Age of Mass Media

机译:大众传媒时代的公共知识分子社会科学家

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

What is the role of the social scientist in public affairs? How can scholars balance the demand that their work remains in the realm of the descriptive or the explanatory while also addressing the ongoing practical concerns of politics and economy? How can the effort to work toward this balance take place in an age of mass media? The ideas underlying contemporary social science are not formed in isolation but develop in a specific context with particular constraints and opportunities. Researchers must contend with these parameters and make choices about how to address topics of interest to them while also meeting the requirements of their profession. Scholars approaching their work as public intellectuals face the challenge of having to straddle these two sets of ethics. From the standpoint of science, they are expected to proceed as detached observers, gathering factual information that can shed new light on existing realities. Acting as public intellectuals, however, means that they must also take into consideration the ways their work relates to contemporary trends and events. Doing so means reflecting on their own starting assumptions, systems of categorization, and the methods they employ. It means seeking creative ways to convey ideas and share findings in the public arena. This paper focuses on some of the challenges involved in developing independent and innovative analyses while also contributing to public debate on contemporary social issues. It addresses some of the very formidable obstacles to this goal and discusses some of the ways scholars have been able to operate as social scientists and as public intellectuals, bridging the gap between these two domains. The institutional constraints facing social scientists are manifold, but they are not all encompassing. It is possible to bridge this gap, provided that they develop an awareness of the contextual forces involved and make a conscious effort to act independently in relation to these ongoing pressures. To the extent that social scientists adopt an informed and reflexive orientation in their work, they can be public intellectuals and offer a significant contribution to public affairs.
机译:社会科学家在公共事务中的作用是什么?学者们如何平衡他们的工作仍停留在描述性或解释性领域的需求,同时又解决政治和经济方面的实际问题?在大众媒体时代如何努力实现这种平衡?当代社会科学的思想并不是孤立地形成的,而是在具有特定限制和机遇的特定环境下发展的。研究人员必须应对这些参数,并在满足其专业要求的同时选择如何解决他们感兴趣的主题。从事公共知识分子工作的学者面临着必须跨越这两种伦理的挑战。从科学的角度来看,人们期望他们作为独立的观察者前进,收集可以为现有现实提供新启示的事实信息。但是,充当公共知识分子意味着他们还必须考虑其工作与当代趋势和事件相关的方式。这样做意味着反思自己的初始假设,分类系统以及他们采用的方法。这意味着寻求在公共场所传达想法和分享发现的创新方法。本文着重于发展独立和创新分析所涉及的一些挑战,同时也有助于就当代社会问题进行公开辩论。它解决了实现此目标的一些非常艰巨的障碍,并讨论了学者们能够作为社会科学家和公共知识分子运作的一些方式,以弥合这两个领域之间的鸿沟。社会科学家所面临的制度约束是多种多样的,但它们并没有全部包含在内。可以弥合这种差距,只要他们对所涉及的情境力量有所了解,并做出有意识的努力就这些持续的压力采取独立行动。在一定程度上,社会科学家在工作中采取知情和反思的取向,他们可以成为公共知识分子,并为公共事务做出重大贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号