首页> 外文期刊>International journal of nuclear law >Looking through the prism of international environment and human rights law - International Civil Nuclear Liability Law and a call for Indian exceptionalism
【24h】

Looking through the prism of international environment and human rights law - International Civil Nuclear Liability Law and a call for Indian exceptionalism

机译:纵观国际环境和人权法的棱镜-《国际民用核责任法》和呼吁印度实行例外主义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

As the spectre of climate change and competition over fossil fuels have led energy-hungry states towards nuclear power, liability rules for nuclear damage have acquired increased significance. However, many of the core common elements of the existing international legal regimes on civil nuclear liability - channelling of liability, quantum and temporal limits, definition of harm, etc. - are not only based on outdated assumptions on the price and utility of nuclear energy, but also conflict with contemporary international environmental law principles. This gulf creates negative incentives against precautionary measures, limits compensation available for potential victims and lends artificial competitiveness to nuclear power. As a result these international regimes cannot, in their present form, serve as appropriate models for Indian attempts at institutionalisation of its liability norms.
机译:随着气候变化的幽灵和对化石燃料的竞争使能源紧缺的国家转向核电,核损害赔偿责任规则变得越来越重要。但是,现有的关于民用核责任的国际法律制度的许多核心共同要素-责任的分配,量子和时间限制,损害的定义等-不仅基于对核能价格和实用性的过时假设。 ,也与当代国际环境法原则相抵触。这一鸿沟对预防措施产生了不利的激励作用,限制了对潜在受害者的赔偿,并给核电带来了人为的竞争力。结果,这些国际制度不能以目前的形式作为印度试图将其责任规范制度化的适当模式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号