首页> 外文期刊>International journal of multicriteria decision making >Comparing principal component analysis and multidimensional scaling for the representation of PROMETHEE results
【24h】

Comparing principal component analysis and multidimensional scaling for the representation of PROMETHEE results

机译:比较主成分分析和多维缩放以表示PROMETHEE结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this paper, we present a new method of visualising the results of PROMETHEE and a comparison of the new method with the common GAIA method (Mareschal and Brans, 1988) and reveal its application in the context of choice for alternative vehicles. Visualisation methods make the impact of each single criterion and its weight on every single alternative visible. The most common method for visualising the results of PROMETHEE models is the GAIA method. To evaluate if GALA itself or visualisation methods themselves are difficult to handle for the decision maker a new visualisation method for PROMETHEE results is developed and compared with the GAIA method. The method we introduce in this paper is based on the classical multidimensional scaling (MDS) (Chatfield and Collins, 1980). MDS is extended by property fitting to integrate each single criterion into the visualisation (Homburg and Krohmer, 2009). We compare the results by applying the procrustes analysis (Gower and Dijksterhuis, 2004). Finally, we give an outlook of future research aspects on the comparison and the new visualisation method in particular.
机译:在本文中,我们提出了一种可视化PROMETHEE结果的新方法,并将其与通用GAIA方法进行了比较(Mareschal和Brans,1988年),并揭示了其在替代车辆选择中的应用。可视化方法使每个单个标准及其权重对每个单个替代项的影响都可见。可视化PROMETHEE模型结果的最常用方法是GAIA方法。为了评估决策者是否难以处理GALA本身或可视化方法本身,针对PROMETHEE结果开发了一种新的可视化方法,并将其与GAIA方法进行了比较。我们在本文中介绍的方法基于经典的多维标度(MDS)(Chatfield和Collins,1980)。通过属性拟合扩展了MDS,以将每个单独的准则集成到可视化中(Homburg和Krohmer,2009)。我们通过应用procrustes分析来比较结果(Gower和Dijksterhuis,2004年)。最后,我们对未来的比较和新的可视化方法进行了展望。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号