首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Microcircuits & Electronic Packaging >A Control-Chart-Based Method for Solder Joint Crack Detection
【24h】

A Control-Chart-Based Method for Solder Joint Crack Detection

机译:基于控制图的焊点裂纹检测方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Many researchers have used different failure criteria in published solder joint reliability studies. Since the reported time-to-failure would be different if different failure criteria were used, it would be difficult to compare the reported reliability life of solder joints from one study to another. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of failure criteria on the reported thermal fatigue life and determine which failure criterion could detect failure sooner. First, the application of the control-chart-based method in a thermal cycling reliability study is described. The reported time-to-failure data were then compared based on four different failure criteria: a control-chart-based method, a 20% resistance increase from IPC-9701 A, a resistance threshold of 500 il, and an infinite resistance. Over 3.5 GB resistance data measured by data loggers from a low-silver solder joint reliability study were analyzed. The results show that estimated time-to-failure based on the control-chart-based method is very similar to that when the IPC-9701A failure criterion is used. Both methods detected failure much earlier than the failure criterion of a resistance threshold of 500 11 or an infinite resistance. A scientific explanation is made of why the 20% increase in IPC-9701A is a reasonable failure criterion and why the IPC-9701 A and the control-chart-based method produced similar results. Three different stages in resistance change were identified: stable, crack, and open. The duration of the crack stage depends on the severity of the test conditions. It is recommend the control-chart-based method be used as the failure criterion because it not only monitors the average of resistance, but also monitors the dispersion of resistance in each thermal cycle over time.
机译:许多研究人员在已发布的焊点可靠性研究中使用了不同的失效标准。如果使用不同的失效标准,则报告的失效时间会有所不同,因此很难比较一项研究与另一项研究报告的焊点可靠性寿命。本研究的目的是评估失效标准对所报告的热疲劳寿命的影响,并确定哪种失效标准可以更快地检测出失效。首先,描述了基于控制图的方法在热循环可靠性研究中的应用。然后根据四种不同的失效标准比较报告的失效时间数据:基于控制图的方法,比IPC-9701 A高20%的电阻,500 il的电阻阈值和无限的电阻。分析了由数据记录器根据低银焊点可靠性研究得出的超过3.5 GB的电阻数据。结果表明,基于控制图的方法估计的故障时间与使用IPC-9701A故障标准时的估计时间非常相似。两种方法都比电阻阈值500 11或无限电阻的故障准则更早地检测到故障。科学地解释了为什么IPC-9701A的20%的增加是合理的故障准则,以及为什么IPC-9701A和基于控制图的方法产生相似的结果。确定了电阻变化的三个不同阶段:稳定,破裂和打开。裂纹阶段的持续时间取决于测试条件的严重性。建议将基于控制图的方法用作故障准则,因为它不仅监视电阻的平均值,而且还监视每个热循环中电阻随时间的分布。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号