...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology >A response to Tisdell on 'Critical perspectives of the 'new' difference equation solution method' of Rivera-Figueroa and Rivera-Rebolledo
【24h】

A response to Tisdell on 'Critical perspectives of the 'new' difference equation solution method' of Rivera-Figueroa and Rivera-Rebolledo

机译:对Tisdell的Rivera-Figueroa和Rivera-Rebolledo的“新'差分方程求解方法的关键观点”的回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Recently, Christopher C. Tisdell questions some claims and results that appear in our article [Rivera-Figueroa A, Rivera-Rebolledo JM. A new method to solve the second-order linear difference equations with constant coefficients. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2016;47(4):636-649.] regarding the novelty and simplicity of a method to solve second-order linear difference equations. He argues that our method was not new because the method already appeared in the mathematical literature, neither was simpler than existing ones. After carefully analysing and comparing the references quoted by Tisdell, we confirm that our method differs from that quoted by Tisdell. Moreover, our approach is simpler because it avoids the uniqueness theorem and the method of variation of parameters, in this context, it offers some clear didactic and epistemological advantages.
机译:最近,克里斯托弗·C·蒂斯德尔(Christopher C. Tisdell)质疑了一些出现在我们文章[Rivera-Figueroa A,Rivera-Rebolledo JM。一种求解常系数二阶线性差分方程的新方法。 Int J Math Educ科学技术。 [2016; 47(4):636-649。]讨论解决二阶线性差分方程的方法的新颖性和简单性。他认为我们的方法不是新方法,因为该方法已经出现在数学文献中,而且都不比现有方法简单。在仔细分析和比较Tisdell引用的参考文献之后,我们确认我们的方法不同于Tisdell引用的方法。而且,我们的方法更简单,因为它避免了唯一性定理和参数变化的方法,在这种情况下,它提供了一些明显的教学和认识论上的优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号