...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Market Research >Labelling and direction of slider questions Results from web survey experiments
【24h】

Labelling and direction of slider questions Results from web survey experiments

机译:滑块问题的标签和方向网络调查结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Using a web survey experiment, this study examines measurement comparability between two radio button questions (fully labelled and endpoint labelled) with slider questions. The slider question is unique to web surveys, displaying a horizontal or vertical line with a bar on the line. Respondents need to click and drag the bar to the desired position on the line in order to register their answers. The study described in this paper found that mean scores, break-off rates, time to complete, reliability and respondents' evaluations are similar across question types, but that the item non-response rate for slider questions is significantly higher than for the radio buttons. In a second experiment, the direction of slider (positive negative vs negative positive) is compared. With few exceptions, all measures, including the mean scores, break-off rates, item non-response rates, time to complete, reliability and respondents' evaluations are similar between the two directions. The implications and limitations of this study are also discussed.
机译:通过网络调查实验,本研究检查了两个带有滑块问题的单选按钮问题(完全标记和终结点标记)之间的测量可比性。滑块问题是网络调查所独有的,它显示水平或垂直线,并在其上显示一个条形图。受访者需要单击并拖动栏到线上的所需位置才能注册他们的答案。本文所述的研究发现,在各个问题类型上,平均得分,完成率,完成时间,可靠性和受访者的评价都相似,但是滑块问题的项目不答复率明显高于单选按钮。在第二个实验中,比较滑块的方向(正负与负正)。除少数例外,两个方向之间的所有度量,包括平均分数,不合格率,项目不答复率,完成时间,可靠性和受访者的评估,都是相似的。还讨论了这项研究的意义和局限性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号