首页> 外文期刊>International journal of marine and coastal law >The 'Lost Mackerel' of the North East Atlantic-The Flawed System of Trilateral and Bilateral Decision-making
【24h】

The 'Lost Mackerel' of the North East Atlantic-The Flawed System of Trilateral and Bilateral Decision-making

机译:东北大西洋的“鲭鱼”-三边和双边决策的有缺陷的体系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The North East Atlantic mackerel is moving westward and northward. How to integrate new coastal states whose Exclusive Economic Zone is invaded by mackerel into existing decision-making processes? The 1982 Law of the Sea Convention, the 1995 Straddling Fish Stocks Agreement, the 1980 North East Atlantic Fisheries Convention, and bilateral and trilateral agreements between 'relevant coastal states' fail to provide rules for present decision-makers to incorporate newcomers. The present harvesting states are sovereign with regard to admitting or refusing newcomers. This article argues for a stricter obligation on coastal states to acknowledge the right of new harvesting nations to access decision-making processes for estimating total allowable catch and allocating quotas. Equitable distribution can occur if quota allocation is subject to principles that are less discretionary than the present ones. One solution is to estimate the ratio of biomass related to the share of coastal states in the distribution of eggs, larvae and fishable stock, and allocate a quota to each coastal and high seas fishing state accordingly.
机译:东北大西洋鲭鱼向西和向北移动。如何将鲭鱼入侵专属经济区的新沿海州纳入现有决策流程? 1982年的《海洋法公约》,1995年的《跨界鱼类种群协定》,1980年的《东北大西洋渔业公约》以及“相关沿海国家”之间的双边和三边协定都没有为当前的决策者提供纳入新移民的规则。目前的收割国在接纳或拒绝新来者方面具有主权。本文认为,沿海国应承担更严格的义务,承认新的收获国有权使用决策程序来估计总允许捕捞量和分配配额。如果配额分配所遵循的原则比目前的自由裁量权少,则可以进行公平分配。一种解决方案是估算与沿海国家在鸡蛋,幼体和可捕鱼种群分配中所占份额有关的比例,并相应地为每个沿海和公海捕捞国家分配配额。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号