首页> 外文期刊>The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law >Reflections on Historic Rights in the South China Sea Arbitration (Merits)
【24h】

Reflections on Historic Rights in the South China Sea Arbitration (Merits)

机译:关于南海仲裁中历史权利的思考(优点)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Annex VII Arbitral Tribunal, in its arbitral award of 12 July 2016, ruled that China's claims to historic rights with respect to the maritime areas of the South China Sea encompassed by the "nine-dash line" are contrary to the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. To support this conclusion, the Tribunal undertook detailed review with regard to the concept of historic rights and the relationship between China's claimed historic rights and the Convention. The temporal or historical element can be regarded as a key element to establish historic rights. However, the Tribunal took an approach that minimises the role of the temporary element when examining the legality of China's claimed historic rights. The Tribunal's view provides an important insight into the concept of historic rights in the international law of the sea.
机译:附件七仲裁庭在2016年7月12日的仲裁裁决中裁定,中国对“九点划线”所涵盖的南中国海海域历史权的主张与联合国《联合国海洋法公约》相抵触。海洋法。为了支持这一结论,法庭对历史权利的概念以及中国主张的历史权利与《公约》之间的关系进行了详细审查。时间或历史因素可以被视为确立历史权利的关键因素。但是,法庭在审查中国主张的历史权利的合法性时采取了一种使临时人员的作用最小化的方法。法庭的观点为国际海洋法中的历史权利概念提供了重要的见识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号