首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Managerial Finance >Capital structure inconclusiveness: evidence from Malaysia, Thailand and Singapore
【24h】

Capital structure inconclusiveness: evidence from Malaysia, Thailand and Singapore

机译:资本结构的不确定性:马来西亚,泰国和新加坡的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper of this study is to examine the possible factors contributing to the issue of inconclusiveness in capital structure studies. This study also attempts to provide logical explanations to the unresolved issue of inconsistencies in the relationship between factors identified and leverage in capital structure studies. Comparisons are also made between the emerging market and the developed market to see whether the findings are consistent with both market landscapes. Design/methodology/approach - This study employs two models in its methodology which are static and dynamic models to examine the effects of using different models in the study. The fixed effect model and partial adjustment model represent the static and dynamic models, respectively. The dynamic model is estimated using generalized method of moments. This study also uses six definitions of leverage to examine the impact of using different leverage definition in capital structure studies. To test the robustness of the findings comparison were made with past studies done by other researchers on developed markets. Findings - This study found that the use of different models (with the same leverage definition) and different leverage definitions (using the same model) give different results including signs. Inconsistencies were more obvious in the different leverage definitions (using the same model) compared to the use of different models (with the same leverage definition). There was also evidence that the findings were consistent with both the emerging and the developed markets as other studies on developed markets also report inconsistent results when using different models and different leverage definitions. Research limitations/implications - The sample chosen focussed only on firms in three emerging markets (Malaysia, Thailand and Singapore) thus it may not be sufficient for generalization. Originality/value - The issue of inconclusive results and findings in capital structure studies keeps recurring but no study has been done to further understand the issue. Using data from the selected countries, this paper attempts to fill this gap in the literature.
机译:目的-本研究的目的是研究导致资本结构研究不确定性问题的可能因素。这项研究还试图为尚未解决的资本结构研究中确定的因素与杠杆之间的关系不一致问题提供逻辑解释。还对新兴市场和发达市场进行了比较,以了解调查结果是否与两个市场格局都一致。设计/方法/方法-这项研究在其方法论中采用了两个模型,即静态模型和动态模型,以检验在研究中使用不同模型的效果。固定效果模型和局部调整模型分别表示静态模型和动态模型。使用广义矩量法估算动力学模型。本研究还使用杠杆的六个定义来检验在资本结构研究中使用不同杠杆定义的影响。为了检验结果的稳健性,我们与其他研究人员在发达市场上所做的以往研究进行了比较。调查结果-该研究发现,使用不同的模型(具有相同的杠杆定义)和不同的杠杆定义(使用相同的模型)会产生不同的结果,包括符号。与使用不同模型(使用相同的杠杆定义)相比,不同杠杆定义(使用相同的模型)的不一致性更加明显。也有证据表明,这些发现与新兴市场和发达市场都一致,因为其他有关发达市场的研究在使用不同模型和不同杠杆定义时也报告不一致的结果。研究的局限性/意义-所选择的样本仅集中于三个新兴市场(马来西亚,泰国和新加坡)的公司,因此可能不足以进行概括。原创性/价值-资本结构研究中不确定的结果和发现的问题反复出现,但尚未进行任何研究以进一步理解该问题。本文使用来自选定国家的数据,试图弥补文献中的这一空白。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号