>The institutionalism paradigm '/> Institutionalism in organisation studies: navigating paradigmatic incommensurability
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy >Institutionalism in organisation studies: navigating paradigmatic incommensurability
【24h】

Institutionalism in organisation studies: navigating paradigmatic incommensurability

机译:组织研究中的制度主义:应对范式不可通约性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

>The institutionalism paradigm has a tenuous relationship with the premise of causation and agency. Part of the problem has been because of the paradigmatic incommensurability (Burrell and Morgan, 1979) mindset that prevails in organisational research. Our intention here is to address this issue. A detailed theoretical review of the institutionalism tradition through 'old institutionalism' (Selznick, 1949); 'historical institutionalism'; and 'neo-institutionalism' (DiMaggio and Powell, 1983) is conducted; followed with a conceptual multi-paradigmatic synthesis (Lowe et al., 2007). Paradigms as diverse as historicism, critical theory and others are discussed as options to resolve the various paradoxes inherent in the neo-institutionalist tradition. We offer a synthetic model to address the issue of paradigmatic incommensurability, which may be treated as a theory-agnostic methodological instrument by future researchers. Subsequently, we demonstrate the methodological tenets of the proposed model by applying it to revisit and re-analyse the much discussed case of Intel's transformation.
机译: >制度主义范式与因果关系和代理关系具有微弱的关系。问题的部分原因是组织研究中普遍存在的范式不可通约性(Burrell和Morgan,1979)。我们的目的是解决这个问题。通过“旧制度主义”对制度主义传统进行详细的理论回顾(Selznick,1949); “历史制度主义”;进行了“新制度主义”(DiMaggio and Powell,1983);其次是概念上的多范式综合(Lowe等,2007)。讨论了历史主义,批判理论等范式,作为解决新制度主义传统中固有的各种悖论的选择。我们提供了一个综合模型来解决范式不可通约性的问题,将来的研究人员可以将其视为与理论无关的方法论工具。随后,我们通过将其应用于重新讨论并重新分析讨论甚多的英特尔案例,来论证所提出模型的方法论宗旨。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号