首页> 外文期刊>The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment >Life Cycle Assessment of Water Production Technologies Part 1: Life Cycle Assessment of Different Commercial Desalination Technologies (MSF, MED, RO)
【24h】

Life Cycle Assessment of Water Production Technologies Part 1: Life Cycle Assessment of Different Commercial Desalination Technologies (MSF, MED, RO)

机译:水生产技术的生命周期评估第1部分:不同商业淡化技术(MSF,MED,RO)的生命周期评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Intention, Goal and Background. In this paper, some relevant results of a research work are presented, the main aim of which consists of performing the environmental assessment of different water production technologies in order to establish, in a global, rigorous and objective way, the less aggressive technology for the environment of potable water supply to the end users. That is, the scope of this paper is mostly oriented to the comparative Life Cycle Assessment of different water production technologies instead of presenting new advancements in the LCA methodology. In Part 1, the environmental loads associated with the most widespread and important commercial desalination technologies all over the world - Reverse Osmosis (RO), Multi Effect Desalination (MED) and Multi Stage Flash (MSF) - are compared. The assessment technique is the Life Cycle Analysis (LCA), which includes the entire life cycle of each technology, encompassing: extraction and processing raw materials, manufacturing, transportation and distribution, operation and final waste disposal.- Methods and Main Features. The software SimaPro 5.0, developed by Dutch PRe Consultants, has been used as the analysis tool, because it is a well known, internationally accepted and validated tool. Different evaluation methods have been applied in the LCA evaluation: CML 2 baseline 2000, Eco-Points 97 and Eco-Indicator 99. Data used in the inventory analysis of this Part 1 come from: a) existing plants in operation; b) data bases implemented in the SimaPro 5.0 software -BUWAL 250, ETH-ESU 96, IDEMAT 2001. Different scenarios have been analyzed in both parts in order to estimate, not only the potential of reduction of the provoked environmental loads with the present state of the art of technology, but also the most likely future trend of technological evolution. In Part 1, different energy production models and the integration of desalination with other productive processes are studied, while the effect of the most likely technological evolution in the midterm, and the estimation of the environmental loads to the water transfer during drought periods are considered in Part 2. Results and Discussion. The main contribution to the global environmental impact of desalination technologies comes from the operation, while the other phases, construction and disposal, are almost negligible when compared to it. Energy is very important in desalination, for this reason the environmental loads change a lot depending on the technology used for providing the energy used in the desalination process. Among the different analyzed technologies, RO is the least aggressive desalination technology (one order of magnitude lower than the thermal processes, MSF and MED) for the environment. When integrating thermal desalination with other productive processes taking advantage of the residual heat, the environmental loads of thermal desalination technologies is highly reduced, obtaining similar loads to that of RO. The environmental loads of desalination technologies are significantly reduced when an energy model based on . renewable energies is used. Taking into account the technological evolution, which is experiencing the RO, a reduction of its environmental load by about 40% is to be expected in the mid-term.
机译:意图,目标和背景。本文介绍了一项研究工作的一些相关结果,其主要目的包括对不同水生产技术进行环境评估,以便以全球,严格和客观的方式建立针对水生产技术的较不积极的技术。向最终用户提供饮用水的环境。也就是说,本文的范围主要是针对不同水生产技术的比较生命周期评估,而不是介绍LCA方法的新进展。在第1部分中,比较了与世界上最广泛,最重要的商业淡化技术(反渗透(RO),多效淡化(MED)和多级闪蒸(MSF))相关的环境负荷。评估技术是生命周期分析(LCA),包括每种技术的整个生命周期,包括:原材料的提取和加工,制造,运输和分配,操作和最终废物处置。-方法和主要特征。由荷兰PRe顾问公司开发的SimaPro 5.0软件已被用作分析工具,因为它是众所周知的,国际上接受和验证的工具。在LCA评估中采用了不同的评估方法:CML 2基准2000,Eco-Points 97和Eco-Indicator99。本第1部分的库存分析中使用的数据来自: b)在SimaPro 5.0软件-BUWAL 250,ETH-ESU 96,IDEMAT 2001中实现的数据库。在这两个部分中分析了不同的场景,以便进行估计,不仅是估计在当前状态下减少引起的环境负荷的潜力技术的发展,也是未来技术发展的最可能趋势。在第1部分中,研究了不同的能源生产模型以及海水淡化与其他生产过程的集成,同时考虑了中期最有可能的技术发展的影响以及干旱期间水转移的环境负荷的估计。第2部分。结果与讨论。海水淡化技术对全球环境影响的主要贡献来自于运营,而与之相比,其他阶段(建设和处置)几乎可以忽略不计。能量在海水淡化中非常重要,因此,环境负荷的变化取决于用于提供海水淡化过程中所用能量的技术。在不同的分析技术中,RO是对环境影响最小的脱盐技术(比热过程,MSF和MED低一个数量级)。当将热脱盐技术与利用余热的其他生产工艺整合在一起时,可大大降低热脱盐技术的环境负荷,从而获得与RO相似的负荷。基于能量模型的海水淡化技术的环境负荷大大降低。使用了可再生能源。考虑到正在经历RO的技术发展,预计中期将减少约40%的环境负荷。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号