首页> 外文期刊>The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment >Comparison of generic and product-specific Life Cycle Assessment databases: application to construction materials used in building LCA studies
【24h】

Comparison of generic and product-specific Life Cycle Assessment databases: application to construction materials used in building LCA studies

机译:通用和特定产品生命周期评估数据库的比较:在建筑LCA研究中使用的建筑材料的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) has been applied in the construction sector since the 1990s and is now more and more embedded in European public policies, e.g., for Environmental Product Declaration regulation or for building labeling schemes. As far as the authors know, these initiatives mainly rely on background impact data of building products provided by different databases' providers. The new product-specific and company-specific EPD data allow having more than one data for describing a building material. But are these new databases really displaying similar LCA results compared to generic databases? Does it depend on which impact category (e.g., global warming, acidification, toxicity) is considered?
机译:自1990年代以来,生命周期评估(LCA)就已在建筑行业中应用,现在已越来越多地嵌入到欧洲公共政策中,例如用于环境产品申报法规或建筑标签计划。据作者所知,这些举措主要依赖于不同数据库提供者提供的建筑产品的背景影响数据。新的特定产品和特定公司的EPD数据允许使用多个数据来描述建筑材料。但是,与通用数据库相比,这些新数据库是否真的显示出相似的LCA结果?它是否取决于所考虑的影响类别(例如,全球变暖,酸化,毒性)?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号