首页> 外文期刊>Building and Environment >Cradle to site Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of natural vs conventional building materials: A case study on cob earthen material
【24h】

Cradle to site Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of natural vs conventional building materials: A case study on cob earthen material

机译:摇篮到网站生命周期评估(LCA)天然VS常规建筑材料:COB土壤材料的案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Cob is an earthen building material that offers a minimally processed, low carbon, and locally available alternative to conventional building materials and methods. This paper provides a framework for a comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) from an embodied perspective of energy and air emissions, using cob earthen wall construction as well as benchmark wall assemblies of concrete masonry and wood frame. The results of the study show that cob production requires only 18-38% energy and reduces 75-82% of global climate change impacts when compared to conventional materials. Significantly, the embodied environmental impacts of cob were shown to be lower than conventional materials in all aspects. Further, sensitivity analysis shows that impacts can be further reduced by maximizing the use of local materials.
机译:COB是一种土地建筑材料,提供了一种微量加工,低碳,以及常规建筑材料和方法的本地可用替代品。本文提供了一种来自体现的能量和空气排放的比较生命周期评估(LCA)的框架,采用COB土墙建设以及混凝土砌体和木材框架的基准墙组件。该研究的结果表明,与常规材料相比,COB产量仅需要18-38%的能量,并减少75-82%的全球气候变化影响。值得注意的是,表现出COB的体现环境影响低于各方面的常规材料。此外,灵敏度分析表明,通过最大化局部材料的使用,可以进一步降低冲击。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号