首页> 外文期刊>The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment >Exploring sustainability potentials in vineyards through LCA? Evidence from farming practices in South Africa
【24h】

Exploring sustainability potentials in vineyards through LCA? Evidence from farming practices in South Africa

机译:通过LCA探索葡萄园的可持续发展潜力? 来自南非农业实践的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Purpose Following the urgency to curb environmental impacts across all sectors globally, this is the first life cycle assessment of different wine grape farming practices suitable for commercial conventional production in South Africa, aiming at better understanding the potentials to reduce adverse effects on the environment and on human health. Methods An attributional life cycle assessment was conducted on eight different scenarios that reduce the inputs of herbicides and insecticides compared against a business as usual (BAU) scenario. We assess several impact categories based on ReCiPe, namely global warming potential, terrestrial acidification, freshwater eutrophication, terrestrial toxicity, freshwater toxicity, marine toxicity, human carcinogenic toxicity and human non-carcinogenic toxicity, human health and ecosystems. A water footprint assessment based on the AWARE method accounts for potential impacts within the watershed. Results and discussion Results show that in our impact assessment, more sustainable farming practices do not always outperform the BAU scenario, which relies on synthetic fertiliser and agrochemicals. As a main trend, most of the impact categories were dominated by energy requirements of wine grape production in an irrigated vineyard, namely the usage of electricity for irrigation pumps and diesel for agricultural machinery. The most favourable scenario across the impact categories provided a low diesel usage, strongly reduced herbicides and the absence of insecticides as it applied cover crops and an integrated pest management. Pesticides and heavy metals contained in agrochemicals are the main contributors to emissions to soil that affected the toxicity categories and impose a risk on human health, which is particularly relevant for the manual labour-intensive South African wine sector. However, we suggest that impacts of agrochemicals on human health and the environment are undervalued in the assessment. The 70% reduction of toxic agrochemicals such as Glyphosate and Paraquat and the 100% reduction of Chlorpyriphos in vineyards hardly affected the model results for human and ecotoxicity. Our concerns are magnified by the fact that manual labour plays a substantial role in South African vineyards, increasing the exposure of humans to these toxic chemicals at their workplace. Conclusions A more sustainable wine grape production is possible when shifting to integrated grape production practices that reduce the inputs of agrochemicals. Further, improved water and related electricity management through drip irrigation, deficit irrigation and photovoltaic-powered irrigation is recommendable, relieving stress on local water bodies, enhancing drought-preparedness planning and curbing CO2 emissions embodied in products.
机译:在全球范围内遏制环境影响的紧迫性,这是适合南非商业常规生产的不同葡萄酒耕作实践的第一个生命周期评估,旨在更好地了解减少对环境不利影响的潜力人类健康。方法对八种不同情景进行归因生命周期评估,这些情况减少了与通常(BAU)情景相比的除草剂和杀虫剂的投入。我们评估了基于配方的几个影响类别,即全球变暖潜力,陆地酸化,淡水富营养化,陆地毒性,淡水毒性,海洋毒性,人类致癌毒性和人类非致癌毒性,人类健康和生态系统。基于感知方法的水占地面积评估占分水岭内的潜在影响。结果与讨论结果表明,在我们的影响评估中,更可持续的农业措施并不总是倾向于依赖于合成肥料和农用化学品的BAU情景。作为一个主要趋势,大多数影响类别都是由灌溉葡萄园中葡萄酒生产的能量要求的主导,即用作农业机械灌溉泵和柴油的电力。跨越影响类别的最有利情景提供了低柴油使用,强烈降低的除草剂和杀虫剂,因为它施加了覆盖作物和综合害虫管理。农药和农业化学质量的重金属是对影响毒性类别的土壤排放的主要贡献者,并对人类健康施加风险,这与人工劳动密集型南非葡萄酒部门特别相关。但是,我们建议农业化学物质对人类健康和环境的影响被低估了评估。葡萄园和百草枯等毒性农用化学品的70%减少,葡萄园中氯吡啶酚的100%减少几乎不会影响人类和生态毒性的模型结果。我们的担忧是通过南非葡萄园在南非葡萄园中发挥重要作用,在其工作场所对这些有毒化学品的暴露产生了重大作用的影响。结论在转换到减少农业化学物质投入的综合葡萄生产实践时,可以获得更可持续的葡萄酒生产。此外,通过滴灌,缺陷灌溉和光伏动力灌溉改善了水和相关电力管理是建议的,缓解当地水体的压力,增强了产品中体现的干旱制备规划和遏制二氧化碳排放。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号