【24h】

Identity theft and internet

机译:身份盗窃和互联网

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The captivating issue of false identity on internet is already an old phenomenon, but until now no uniform legal response really exists. For some, anonymity is deemed to be a right, but for others, using a false identity will be a tort. Thus, the protection of the identity takes various forms, both in civil action and in criminal procedure. However, the question involves a second aspect, not only in substantial law, but also in the field of law of evidence: how does one prove the real identity of the author of a computer related crime? The difficulty to connect the use of an IP address, or even of an electronic certificate, to a real person leads automatically to other legal responses which aim more directly to condemn identity theft and unauthorised access to information systems! The objective of this paper is to discuss the need of a reformulation of the concept of identity theft in order to correspond to the evolution of the behaviour and frauds. On the internet, identity theft is not the same as in the real world - a means of the commission of other offences, but is rather an autonomous crime.
机译:迷人的互联网上虚假身份问题已经是一个古老的现象,但是直到现在,还没有真正的统一法律对策。对于某些人来说,匿名被视为一种权利,但是对于其他人来说,使用虚假身份将构成侵权。因此,在民事诉讼和刑事诉讼中,对身份的保护均采取多种形式。但是,这个问题不仅涉及实体法律,还涉及证据法律领域的第二个方面:如何证明计算机相关犯罪的作者的真实身份?将IP地址甚至是电子证书的使用与真实人联系起来的困难会自动导致其他法律响应,这些响应旨在更直接地谴责身份盗窃和未经授权访问信息系统!本文的目的是讨论重新定义身份盗用概念的必要性,以适应行为和欺诈的演变。在互联网上,身份盗用与现实世界不同,后者是实施其他犯罪的一种手段,而是一种自主犯罪。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号