首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Law and Management >Hamada's equation, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the UK Companies Act of 2006: A critique
【24h】

Hamada's equation, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the UK Companies Act of 2006: A critique

机译:滨田方程,2002年《萨班斯-奥克斯利法案》和2006年的《英国公司法案》:评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to show that Hamada's equation, which is used operationally to evaluate changes in capital structure as a result of changes in financial leverage, is subject to a number of non-trivial deficiencies. Each of these deficiencies is of sufficient importance to nullify the fundamental purpose of this equation, render its function impossible, and epistemologically contradict its functioning. Moreover, to the extent that it is dependent on the empirically invalid capital asset pricing model (CAPM), Hamada's equation defies basic requirements of sound research methodology. Since it cannot do what it purports to do and is an operational fiction, it cannot assist directors with capital structure valuations in terms of Section 172 of the UK Companies Act of 2006. Further, if used operationally, is likely to contravene Section 807 §1348 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Design/methodology/approach – A secondary survey of Hamada's equation, recent UK and US legislation and the literature of corporate financial management is undertaken in order to examine whether the fundamental purpose, function and functioning of this equation could validly and reliably achieve what it purports to achieve. Findings – The derivation of Hamada's equation assumes perfect competition, yet to achieve its fundamental purpose and its function it is dependent on financial markets being inefficient and imperfectly competitive. Thus, its functioning requires a state that its mathematical derivation negates. Epistemologically, this equation is unsound, and since it is also dependent on an empirically invalid approach to the calculation of the cost of capital, the CAPM, Hamada's equation is an invalid valuation equation. Originality/value – This paper shows that Hamada's equation defies basic requirements of sound research methodology, cannot assist directors with their duties in terms of Section 172 of the UK Companies Act of 2006 with regard to capital structure and financial leverage management, and is in conflict with Section 807 § 1348 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
机译:目的–本文的目的是证明Hamada方程在操作上用于评估由于财务杠杆变化而导致的资本结构变化,该方程存在许多不小的缺陷。这些缺陷中的每一个都具有足够的重要性,足以使该方程式的基本目的无效,使其功能无法实现,并在认识论上与它的功能相矛盾。此外,在一定程度上取决于经验上无效的资本资产定价模型(CAPM),滨田方程满足了合理研究方法的基本要求。由于它无法做它想做的事情并且是一种操作性虚构,因此它无法协助董事根据2006年《英国公司法》第172条进行资本结构评估。此外,如果将其用于操作,则很可能违反第807条第1348条2002年《萨班斯-奥克斯利法案》的制定。设计/方法/方法–对Hamada的方程式,英国和美国的最新立法以及公司财务管理文献进行了二次调查,目的是检查该程序的基本目的,功能和功能是否正常。方程可以有效,可靠地实现其声称的目标。研究结果– Hamada方程的推导假设完全竞争,但要实现其基本目的和功能,则取决于金融市场的效率低下和竞争性。因此,其功能要求其数学推导取反的状态。从认识论上讲,该方程式是不合理的,并且由于它还依赖于经验上无效的方法来计算资本成本,因此CAPM Hamada方程式是无效的估值方程式。独创性/价值–本文表明,滨田方程式无法满足合理研究方法的基本要求,无法根据2006年《英国公司法》第172条就资本结构和财务杠杆管理方面协助董事履行职责,并且存在冲突以及2002年《萨班斯-奥克斯利法案》第807条第1348节的规定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号