...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of intelligence and counter intelligence >Principles to Assess Accountability: A Study of Intelligence Agencies in Spain and Brazil
【24h】

Principles to Assess Accountability: A Study of Intelligence Agencies in Spain and Brazil

机译:评估问责制的原则:西班牙和巴西情报机构的研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Over the last few decades, intelligence studies moved from a unique theory based on secrecy to multiple epistemologies to address different objects (e.g., intelligence analysis, counterintelligence, foreign intelligence, military intelligence). For example, the organizational and functional fields highlight normative principles, such as efficiency, professionalization, and cooperation among intelligence organizations, international arenas, and private actors. As Peter Gill and Mark Phythian observe, few organizations change themselves easily and, if reform or regression takes place, it is very likely to be the result of external pressure from other, government or civil society, actors. These changes and pressures are the subjects of the governance and policy subfield in which the key question is related to the intelligence impact on government and vice versa. However, this subfield can be extended to a dmutual impact between government-mediated by intelligence agencies-and society, especially in countries of political transition and democratic consolidation.
机译:在过去的几十年中,情报研究从一个独特的理论从一个独特的理论转移到多个认识论来解决不同的物体(例如,智力分析,违反智慧,外国情报,军事情报)。例如,组织和功能领域突出了智力组织,国际竞技场和私人行为者之间的效率,专业化和合作等规范性原则。随着彼得鳃和标记植物观察,很少有组织容易改变自己,如果发生改革或回归,那么来自其他政府或民间社会的外部压力,行动者的结果很可能。这些变化和压力是治理和政策子领域的主题,其中关键问题与政府的情报影响有关,反之亦然。但是,这个子场可以扩展到智力机构和社会的政府介导之间的反对影响,特别是在政治转型和民主合并中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号