首页> 外文期刊>International journal of hydrogen energy >Comparative risk study of hydrogen and gasoline dispensers for vehicles
【24h】

Comparative risk study of hydrogen and gasoline dispensers for vehicles

机译:车辆用氢气和汽油分配器的比较风险研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper describes an investigation into the acceptability of installing hydrogen dispensers in public areas based on risk assessments. Because gasoline dispenser risks have been widely accepted for many years, they were used as a benchmark in this study to analyze the risks of hydrogen dispensers. More specifically, we performed risk assessments for both hydrogen and gasoline dispensers and then compared and analyzed the results. We began the process by creating models for both hydrogen and gasoline dispensers that represented their various specifications and elements. Next, potential accident scenarios for each dispenser model were identified by failure mode effect analysis (FMEA) and hazard and operability study (HAZOP). The risks of each scenario were then qualitatively evaluated and the results were organized into risk matrices. By comparing the results of both hydrogen and gasoline dispensers with and without existing safety measures, the appropriateness of their safety measures were validated. Furthermore, by comparing the results of hydrogen and gasoline dispenser safety measures, it was confirmed that the risk levels of the two types were practically equivalent. Therefore, we concluded that the risks involved with installing hydrogen dispensers in public areas can be considered acceptable. (C) 2018 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:本文介绍了根据风险评估调查在公共场所安装氢气分配器的可接受性。由于汽油分配器的风险已被广泛接受多年,因此在本研究中将其用作基准来分析氢气分配器的风险。更具体地说,我们对氢气和汽油加油机都进行了风险评估,然后比较并分析了结果。我们通过为氢气和汽油加油机创建模型来开始流程,这些模型代表了它们的各种规格和元素。接下来,通过故障模式影响分析(FMEA)和危害与可操作性研究(HAZOP)确定了每种加油机型号的潜在事故场景。然后对每种情况的风险进行定性评估,并将结果组织到风险矩阵中。通过比较有和没有现有安全措施的氢气和汽油分配器的结果,验证了其安全措施的适当性。此外,通过比较氢气和汽油加油机安全措施的结果,可以确定这两种类型的风险水平实际上是相同的。因此,我们得出的结论是,在公共场所安装氢气分配器所涉及的风险可以认为是可以接受的。 (C)2018氢能出版物有限公司。由Elsevier Ltd.出版。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号