首页> 外文期刊>International journal of hydrogen energy >A comparative techno-economic and quantitative risk analysis of hydrogen delivery infrastructure options
【24h】

A comparative techno-economic and quantitative risk analysis of hydrogen delivery infrastructure options

机译:氢送基础设施选项的比较技术经济和定量风险分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The comparative techno-economic analysis and quantitative risk analysis (QRA) of the hydrogen delivery infrastructure covering the national hydrogen demands are presented to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the infrastructure of commercial hydrogen delivery. The cost calculation model, which was based on the hydrogen delivery scenario analysis model (HDSAM), was employed to estimate the costs of hydrogen fuel delivery in Seoul, Korea, whose area is small enough to not require intermediate delivery stations. The QRA methodology was modified to be suitable for the comparative analysis of the whole hydrogen infrastructure. The capacities of a hydrogen refueling station and the hydrogen market penetration were employed as the main variables and the two scenarios, viz. the gaseous and liquid hydrogen delivery options, were considered. The analysis results indicate that the delivery system of gaseous hydrogen was superior in terms of cost and that of liquid hydrogen was superior in terms of safety. Both delivery options were affected by the capacity of the station and the market penetration, and the cost and risk drastically changed, especially when the two variables were small. Thus, according to the results, the economic and safety issues of the hydrogen delivery infrastructure are critical to achieving a hydrogen energy society.
机译:提出了涵盖国家氢气需求的氢送基础设施的比较技术经济分析和定量风险分析(QRA),以了解商业氢递送基础设施的全面了解。采用基于氢输送场景分析模型(HDSAM)的成本计算模型来估算韩国首尔的氢燃料输送的成本,其面积足够小,不需要中间输送站。 QRA方法被修改为适用于整个氢基础设施的比较分析。氢气加油站和氢气市场渗透的能力被用作主要变量和两个场景,viz。考虑气态和液态氢递送选择。分析结果表明,气态氢的输送系统在成本方面优越,液体氢的安全性优异。交付选项都受到车站的能力和市场渗透率的影响,并且成本和风险大大变化,特别是当两个变量很小时。因此,根据结果,氢递送基础设施的经济和安全问题对于实现氢能社会至关重要。

著录项

  • 来源
    《International journal of hydrogen energy》 |2021年第27期|14857-14870|共14页
  • 作者

    Lee Y.; Lee U.; Kim K.;

  • 作者单位

    System Research Center Yullin Technologies Co. Ltd. Seoul 06245 Republic of Korea;

    Clean Energy Research Center Korea Institute of Science and Technology Seoul 02792 Republic of Korea|Division of Energy and Environmental Technology KIST School Korea University of Science and Technology Seoul 02792 Republic of Korea|Green School Korea University 145 Anam-ro Seongbuk-gu Seoul 02841 Republic of Korea;

    Clean Energy Research Center Korea Institute of Science and Technology Seoul 02792 Republic of Korea;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Delivery infrastructure option; Hydrogen delivery; Quantitative risk analysis; TEA;

    机译:交付基础设施选项;氢递送;定量风险分析;茶;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号